351 C 2bbl History ??

Dave Noll · 01-12-2014, 12:55 AM

Billy,
Did some research. The 71 is the same engine rated @ 240 in both sides of the classification guide. The 70 has a little more cam, carb, & compression & is @ 250. I dug out an old old Motor's manual & looked up the 70 & it also had it rated @ 250 @ 4600 & torque was 355 @ 2600. Since apparently Ford had this thing (71,72) @ 240 do you think NHRA will go below that ?

Billy Nees · 01-12-2014, 09:16 AM

Bill, I doubt it!

Dave, yup.

Dave Noll · 01-12-2014, 05:36 PM

Worth a try. Thanks.

01-12-2014, 12:55 AM	#1
Dave Noll Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA Posts: 710 Likes: 2,671 Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts	Re: 351 C 2bbl History ?? Billy, Did some research. The 71 is the same engine rated @ 240 in both sides of the classification guide. The 70 has a little more cam, carb, & compression & is @ 250. I dug out an old old Motor's manual & looked up the 70 & it also had it rated @ 250 @ 4600 & torque was 355 @ 2600. Since apparently Ford had this thing (71,72) @ 240 do you think NHRA will go below that ? __________________ Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526

01-12-2014, 09:16 AM	#2
Billy Nees VIP Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: On a hilltop in Pa. Posts: 4,496 Likes: 3,600 Liked 7,758 Times in 1,741 Posts	Re: 351 C 2bbl History ?? Bill, I doubt it! Dave, yup. __________________ Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K

01-12-2014, 05:36 PM	#3
Dave Noll Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA Posts: 710 Likes: 2,671 Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts	Re: 351 C 2bbl History ?? Worth a try. Thanks. __________________ Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode