|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]()
For what it is worth.
I talked to 3 good friends, who also happen to be current or former NHRA tech officials, all of them well liked and respected, who said they found more illegal cars in the bottom 10 of the field than in the top 20. A lot more. If you think about it, being really fast is just inviting a tear down. There are a few cars that are extremely fast that have been torn down by respected tech guys and found legal, more than once, but are still accused of being completely illegal, even by guys who you'd think would not be fooled.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
As far as teardowns and how to choose them. How about cars that can and have run tenths below an already fast record and never set the record (or win class for one reason or another). Years ago, I built a combo that ran in a popular class and it was clearly 2 tenths faster than anyone had gone in that class. At the first divisional it ran he was told by tech that he needed to set the record at the next divisional he attended because "it would be a shame to be torn down and not get the record". Message read loud and clear. He set the record, was checked from top to bottom and found legal. More of that and less BS is what is needed today. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|