|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Here we go. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Red Oak, TX
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
OK, I will bite... Too hot to do much more here right now.
![]() Never ran fuel injection on a race car, so I sure can NOT offer "facts" on back to back test. My response below is directed to a stock eliminator setup. With "all else equal" including "expert" tuners of both carbs and injection, I would say that fuel injection would be faster. Reasons: You can tune each cylinder much more accurately with injection. The programming is there to change the fuel load to each cylinder. With a good data collection system, and egt on each tube, you can tell what each cylinder is doing with each change, and level them out. You can set the fuel curve, taking temperatures, flow, rpm, etc. into the mix. This makes a smoother motor, and should make more power overall. Even the best carb tuner is subject to the flow of the intake, to take the fuel load to the cylinders. Just not going to be as accurate, as having the ability to inject directly into the runner, so it is not impacted by the other cylinders in an open intake. Yes, we can corner jet a Holley, etc. but still not like having the ability to inject into each cylinder, and change it thru the rpm range. There is my two cents... please adjust for inflation as needed! Ken Stock 412 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Punta Gorda Isles, Fl.
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 3,414
Liked 795 Times in 210 Posts
|
![]()
Come'on Joe thats an easy one, even for you.
No more cigars or lake house for you. And you better be at my BBQ this year, & bring the shirts, XL & 3XL. to ATCO.
__________________
"Pistol" Pete Dutko |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|