|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Alex, what Holley are you trying to get approved for the 289 over the last ten years? Other than the 306 HP Shelby, I've never seen a Holley equipped 289.
Since your up on Fords, what factory (non Boss) 351C came with an aluminum intake manifold? Besides the Pantera. If only the 351C HO came with a Holley, why are they on the other 351C's, Boss included? Why is is that 390 Ford 4bbl's like Mustang came with a 600 Holley and now run the 735 Holly from the CJ? I'm not even going to the Shelby issues. And yes, the old Rambler 327 had a Holley 4bbl. Don't know the size. Engine discontinued in 1965.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX Last edited by Jeff Lee; 09-08-2012 at 06:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 853
Liked 595 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
On the larger issue, it seems that many people have lost track of the fact that drag racing used to be about engineering. Better parts ran better, and better racers ran even better than that. I feel for all the AMC racers as I owned a really nice 68 AMX 343 Go Package car in 1969. I had to retire from racing for a year or so until I bought a 70 Duster 340 and I could show my face again. Sorry, but it was just better engineering. Headers really helped the AMX but only to the point where I might not be embarrased by a 327/300 Impala. The Super Stock AMX was a very good car, as were the Hurst Ramblers and the Hornet 360s. So, as much as I like those cars (one of the last things on my list is to build a Pro Street Pacer) I still can't agree with all the superceded parts. That goes for ALL those pulling these stunts, whether they race Mopar, Fords, Chevies, or AMC. No one at Glendora still remembers what we're supposed to be doing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|