|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Respectfully, Jeff, there are rocker sets out there that actually do cost that much with the modifications allowed to fit the application. Some applications can't have these types of modifications done physically. These are special built pieces that will pass the "new rule" but offer advantages over the common roller rocker. They are on the approved list but the modifications are not (in my opinion) in the spirit of the rule. Actually, we don't know what will go thru tech under the new rule until it is either kicked or passed. But I know of at least a couple that have been looked at and passed. Mostly because the people looking at them didn't know what they were looking for. That is the biggest reason some of us were against allowing rockers. I'm all for the interest of preventing engine failures in any way possible. Its like the disc brake rule that everyone wanted in the interest of saftey. What was really wanted was dual calipers or more holding power on the rear tires to allow higher stall speeds. I have stopped too many low 9 sec. drum brake heavy superstockers for years without any problems, however, I agree the discs are better at stopping. But stopping and saftey was, for many, a "smoke screen" as a way to get a car to work better off a chip in the first 60'.
Last edited by SS Engine Guy; 05-04-2012 at 03:53 AM. Reason: spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The rules or even lack of rules will always have a few with unlimited budgets & unlimited egos doing whatever it takes. I'm one example that decided to go back to Stock purely as a result of the roller rocker allowance. I bought the Comp Cams stainless rockers which was around $400 for my AMC. I think Harland Sharpe sells an aluminum roller for $250 or so and that would be acceptable to me if that was all that was available. Adjusting lash and or replacing rockers at the track is no fun on the schedule i kept. Luckily a broken rocker ever took out an wngine and dumped oil on the track. And I know a few others that can now legally run roller rockers that ran them illegally in the past. That I do not condone but it was occurring
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX Last edited by Jeff Lee; 05-04-2012 at 02:45 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
If they would have kept the valve spring rule, roller rockers would not be needed.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lynden ,WA
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Price a set of rollers for a Hemi. $1000 is cheap.
__________________
2009 V/SA Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Oh yea..forgot about that mega dollar piece. But then again, if you can afford to race a Hemi in Stock, an extra $500 or so above the cost of the typical wedge or canted valve in Stock. Hard to gain sympathy by using a Hemi as a crying post.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|