|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,624
Liked 392 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]()
Nope, pony car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
The Iron Duke (also called the 2500, 151, Pontiac 2.5, Cross Flow, and Tech IV, though the decal on the air filter assemblies actually reads "4 Tech") was a 2.5 L (150.8 cu in) I4 piston engine. All Iron Dukes were built by Pontiac beginning in 1977 and ending in 1993. After this time, the GM 2.2 L OHV 4-cylinder replaced it across the entire lineup of vehicles that offered it.
This 151 was also used by American Motors (AMC) starting in 1980, as the base engine option in the RWD Spirit and Concord, and continuing in both cars through 1982. The AWD (4x4) Eagle carried the 151 as standard equipment for 1981, and carried it midway through the 1983 model year. It was also available (as the Hurricane) in economy model Jeep CJs. AMC replaced the Iron Duke 2.5L I4 with a 150cid Inline-4 of their own, derived from their evergreen sixes. The Iron Duke is often confused with Chevrolet's Stovebolt-derived 153 from the 1960s Chevy II, but the engines are entirely different - the Iron Duke's intake manifold is on the passenger side, as opposed to the driver side. Applications:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Iron_Duke_engine |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
bob wollet was a great guy i use to race ihra with him he almost always qualified number 1 he was a stand up guy have nothing but good to say about him that is a awsome car he has
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New york
Posts: 592
Likes: 131
Liked 46 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe I'm wrong but I think the duke has been mistaken for the quad 4.
anyone remember the quad 442. Didn't the production duke engine have the oil filter in the oil pan. remove the drain plug and outr comes the filter. Been a while since I worked at Pontiac, 87, 88. Lots of replacing cam gears, no chains. Anyone remember the recall 84C-15. In the fieros, leaking oil on the exhaust and poof. Friend from Jeep has a complete built virgin Iron Duke Super Duty motor and parts too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
It seems there were several types of Oldsmobile Quad 4 motors...
Read more here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Quad-4_engine ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Hemi Moose; 05-01-2012 at 11:03 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The following year the new and improved cross flow head was on that engine. Thats how I recall it and I worked in a Pontiac dealer and worked on those cars regularly. GM was producing some real junk and as a line mechanic I got to work on all sorts of engineering marvels...... This was the era of "corporate engines under the hood". Engines were calibrated so lean they could barely get out the driveway sometimes without bucking and missing......and my personal favorite....the odd fire Buick V6 3.8....shook so bad they had to add counterweights and soft engine and trans mounts. I have some very funny stories from my days working on these cars and what we did to try and diagnose and fix some of these cars. It was a Pontiac-Jeep-Subaru dealership and I worked on them all as an A Tech....
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,624
Liked 392 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]()
Well Ed, the sports cars of the time were tiny european open top cars with 4 wheel independant suspension and the focus was on handling. (triumph/mg's/porche/etc.
While the mustang did compete in some "sporty car" races it was a 2+2 car that handled well (for that time period) and the focus was more on fun and affordability. It was at home on a twisty track but was also home on a dragstrip and had optional v-8 engines strictly for straight line. Sports cars on the other hand were solely twisty cars and didn't accellerate well enough to compete in drag racing. A 1500lb car with 75hp was great zipping through the S's and switchbacks but laughable on a straightaway or dragstrip. Now people car them musclecars which isn't right either. Musclecars were cars designed to purely go in a straight line, all muscle. A bigblock chevelle or torino or various hemi's fit that bill. Camaro's/cuda's&challenger were all pony cars because they were built to fit into the "new" class of vehicle that the mustang started. Mustang, being a horse the class was called "pony". Semantic's for the most part but the mustang was not intended to be or ever was comparable to a MG or triumph. (the same as a camaro was never meant to be) Of course this is just my opinion too, the same as me hating imports is my opinion. hehehe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|