HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2012, 03:54 PM   #1
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,815 Times in 413 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aubrey N Bruneau View Post
We can't control manufacturer's tolerances. I mean REALLY... 1.7 ratio... give or take .05.. ?
Who gives a $%#T ? !
Lift at the retainer below blueprint spec... studs, pushrods, springs, all of the specified configuration and mounting. We haven't changed valves, hacked up the heads, or gone over factory lift at the valve.
WHAT is the problem ? !
Rocker arms, and valvetrain geometry in general, remain as two of the most misunderstood areas of a race engine. About half of what people think they know about the subjects is wrong. Maybe more.

That's not directed at you, personally, Aubrey, but rather a general statement.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S

Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 01-24-2012 at 04:00 PM.
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 04:34 PM   #2
Aubrey N Bruneau
Member
 
Aubrey N Bruneau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Eastern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 311
Likes: 6
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Aubrey N Bruneau
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
That's not directed at you, personally, Aubrey, but rather a general statement.
Yeah ? YEAH ? !
HEE HEE !
maybe I know less than that ?

I'm just sayin... It seems to me that much of the reason NHRA removed the spring pressure and duration rules, was to simplify inspection and enforcement. Of course it changed things. This rocker allowance can be simplified too. Merely have a ratio tolerance... IE; +/- .05, and if lift at valve checks ok... we're good.
I understand that "ingenious" folks may discover advantages one way or another. Positioning of the fulcrum-point for one. Shaft rocker setups are probably more stable, but stud rockers are more user friendly.

I dunno
maybe I'm just simple ?!
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S
62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409
Aubrey N Bruneau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 05:29 PM   #3
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,815 Times in 413 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

There already is a rocker ratio tolerance, it is +0.0/-x.x, as they don't seem to penalize anyone for not having enough ratio. You can have the stock blueprint ratio, or less, but not any more than stock. That's tolerance enough, a + 0.0/-x.x is an industry accepted tolerance range.

NHRA checks lift at the retainer, then divides by lift at the cam to get rocker ratio. I'm allowed 0.520" at the retainer, I run 0.518", with 0.306" lobe lift on the cam, for a 1.69:1 rocker ratio.

In Stock, we have to use pushrod length to correct lift, in most cases. That does not change, it's just that with aftermarket roller rockers, you'll need to start from scratch, and get the pushrod that gives you the correct lift, without exceeding the allowed rocker ratio.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.