|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Thats for the racer to check to make sure this dosent happen. Not the cam company or rocker makers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I was just wanting to know what the odds are you are going to have to change cams when switching to roller rockers that have a true 1.5 ratio. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
We've just been through this upgrade with rockers, pushrod length etc. What we saw was changes in lift at the valve due to the rocker change, but also as we varied the pushrod length and went from break in to full racing valve spring pressure. After sorting out the rest, we had to order a cam with .006" less lobe lift to get back under our allowed lift of .398" on the 325hp 396. You get rid of a lot of deflection going to the new rockers, so if you'd used a cam ground with extra lift originally to get close to the spec, it would be important to check it after installing the roller rockers. Just my 2 cents.......
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|