HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2011, 09:59 AM   #1
Tom Goldman
VIP Member
 
Tom Goldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 885
Liked 859 Times in 234 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigo Perf View Post
Key words in the rulebook are "any" and "only". I personally wouldn't have a problem with the aluminum 3rd members for 9" Ford users, and, so what if it is aftermarket. That's what this industry is driven by....the aftermarket!
But.....if the 2011 Drag Packs can use a Ford 9" does that allow all Mopar racers that option? If Tech is getting spread too thin then maybe they need to pick their battles and start by the using the word "any" a little bit more in the rulebook.

When was the last time someone collected protest money? Just curios.

TP
There is no performance advantage to the aluminum chunk ,other than a few pounds that will have to be made up anyway. ...So why not allow them.
The "9"inch housing some Drag Pak cars are using only utilizes the housing stamping . It has a different mounting flange that accepts the Mopar 8 3/4" aluminum chunk [good luck getting one!], not the Ford 9'" chunk.
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK
Tom Goldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 10:31 AM   #2
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 239
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Wade, Very good idea but Glendora, now Indy and there lies another problem. Where will Danny be ? The way I see it 2 of the best, Travis Miller and Wesley Robenson have been belittled, forced to change their decisions and had their pay cut. When you have 2 tech men with the knowledge of these 2 have why not use them ? Instead they are pushed farther away. Wesley had more info on HP for the AHFS but was removed from the committee. I do not think NHRA can handle a national scale rule book when it comes to Stock and SS, there pick of the week check at national events is about as far as they can go. Real tech done at Indy often is changed by Danny, if the head guy runs the ship and continues to do so Stock and SS are doomed, the rules have been diluted to a point of no return.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 11:12 AM   #3
CycloneFE
Senior Member
 
CycloneFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Decatur Illinois
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

In this day and age NHRA could easily have someone sitting in Glendora with an internet connection and the guy in tear down can take a pic or vid and sametime it to Glendora and have an imediate answer. Glendora could file the incident and recall it anytime it should arise or make it avalable to the next guy in teardown that has the same question.

We do things like this at work all day long.
__________________
Steve Jackson
CycloneFE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 11:18 AM   #4
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

All the B.S. about the aluminum 9" center section is just more silliness. It's a few pounds of unsprung weight, that allows for that weight to be moved.

It's like aluminum radiators. The weight advantage itself is negligible, at best, and anyone wanting that weight advantage can find it elsewhere.

Anyone notice Pond slowing down when they made him take his out? I'm betting Ken won't slow down, either.

I suppose a racer were to have an aftermarket 9" housing that had 12 bolt Chevy parts in it, THAT would be a valid issue for tech.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 11:30 AM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
All the B.S. about the aluminum 9" center section is just more silliness.
Alan, you probably feel the same way about the negligible affect of aftermarket seats in Stock too.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 11:56 AM   #6
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Alan, you probably feel the same way about the negligible affect of aftermarket seats in Stock too.
Billy, with the advent of 135 MPH cars in Stock Eliminator, I think the safety aspects outweigh the other factors. It's called a "necessary evil". The fast cars in Stock now have to have all of the safety equipment that a fairly fast Super Stock car has. It's not a matter of what you or I want, or what you or I like, it's a matter of safety.

It's a plain simple fact that you can make a Stock Eliminator car as close to perfect on weight distribution as it can legally be without any of those things.

People howl over things that don't matter, while they look over things that do matter. A case of the elephant in the living room.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 12:20 PM   #7
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

[QUOTE=Alan Roehrich;244948

People howl over things that don't matter, while they look over things that do matter. A case of the elephant in the living room.[/QUOTE]

And on that, I will have to agree with you!
Now, let's start a "meaningful dialog" on the pathetic purses!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 12:33 PM   #8
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
And on that, I will have to agree with you!
Now, let's start a "meaningful dialog" on the pathetic purses!
Billy, the problem is that it will not be meaningful to NHRA, the people who set the purse and the fees.

But as an example, for a 64 car field in Stock Eliminator, the payout should be $2500 to win. And the entry fee really ought to be $250 for car, driver, and one crew. That would be a payout of ten times the entry fee. For an 100 car field, it ought to be $3000, that would be twelve times the entry fee. At 128 cars, it should pay at least $3750. As the field gets bigger, so should the purse. That's a start, and not at all unreasonable.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 11:57 AM   #9
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
All the B.S. about the aluminum 9" center section is just more silliness. It's a few pounds of unsprung weight, that allows for that weight to be moved.

It's like aluminum radiators. The weight advantage itself is negligible, at best, and anyone wanting that weight advantage can find it elsewhere.

Anyone notice Pond slowing down when they made him take his out? I'm betting Ken won't slow down, either.

I suppose a racer were to have an aftermarket 9" housing that had 12 bolt Chevy parts in it, THAT would be a valid issue for tech.
There are a couple of ways to look at what they nhra tech did to Ken.
One was they could have told him to change it when he got home. I believe this would have been the right thing to do.
But they could have let him go through tech, then after qualifying. Tossed him. I've had that done to me. At least Ken had a chance to fix it before the race.
The only thing nhra tech has been successful with is nitpicking. I went through it last year with my front fenders.
What happened to all the hooplah about the runner cc's?
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 12:09 PM   #10
danny waters sr
VIP Member
 
danny waters sr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Is there a supreme tech god for Stock and Super/Stock

Another question, If NHRA would have told him to change it by the next race ,would Ken have told everybody that , or would it not be mentioned till it was set as an example ? If Ken would not have said anything now ,this would still be a little secret. I respect Ken for telling it so it would not happen to others......I also think Ken would have told it if he was given til the next race. You have my respect Ken...This is two ways of looking at it from both sides. Shady rule as you say anyway....
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340"
danny waters sr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.