|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 09-08-2010 at 01:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,136
Likes: 1,617
Liked 1,924 Times in 432 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Jim Kaekel;208960]
Quote:
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Jeff,
You are absolutely correct, you were #141 qualifier last year at Indy and I cannot find anything on this site where you were complaining about other cars or your HP. Although it is not an option for all of us to build or buy a different car it is still a performanced based class, it is just that the performance is changing. I don't think the #1 qualifier has $100,000 in that car nor does the #8, #9, #10, #16, #17 or #18 qualifier. I am not siding with NHRA, but we all make our choices, some good, some not so good. Things are always changing in the drag racing world (some good, some not so good). I think a lot of us sportsman guys feel we don't get any respect from NHRA, from TV time to correct HP on all combinations. But we are still part of the show, we could be phased out like the Pro Stock trucks and end up just bracket racers with nothing to show for our hard work, time, money and effort ... Everyone knew what the DP's and CJ's were capable of before Indy. Some racers were able to change class and dodge the bullet, others could not, but you still entered. Look at what it costs to run a SS/AH car, how many of those guys had a chance of winning? But they still entered to be part of the show. 8.60's or 8.70's is still fast for an AH car, but that was not good enough to make the final cut.
__________________
Chuck Beach 3340 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|