|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Live Reporter
|
![]()
Dave -- You must be talking about the one that got HP this week and will more than likely get it again at years end .................
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
I'll go way back.
1962 Dodge/Plymouth 361/305HP Pretty dominant from 62' thru 67'. And of course the early 69' Chevy 350/255HP LM1 engine in the Camaro's and Nova's. PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 884
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
nhra rated at 300 not the factory
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 884
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
1974 factory rated was 190hp
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LEXINGTON NC.
Posts: 389
Likes: 43
Liked 18 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
There are some good 350's out there but the 255 rated @ 280 is not one... It's fair at best ! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Englewood, Florida
Posts: 990
Likes: 36
Liked 317 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
If you want the best HP rated car contact Bob Shaw. I'm sure he could put together some combo that would do the trick.
Ron Ortiz U/SA not the best combo
__________________
Ron Ortiz 2102 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,837
Likes: 2,931
Liked 5,148 Times in 1,965 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
He might be looking for "ancient" combos like the blown 312 Fords, etc. Overall though, I'd say it would have to the GM 1993 LT1 ,which is now + 71 HP over what it entered the books at.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1,149
Liked 905 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
I would value the opinions of the four "gurus" of Stock - Mark Yac, Neil Smedley, Bob Shaw and Billy Nees. We've heard from Mark. I await hearing from the others. I know this much, my combo is definitely NOT the best - '86 305 165/249.
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 372
Likes: 43
Liked 98 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Put the flat hood on and its 20 less than the automatic. In the Camaro its 24 less than the automatic In a Corvette is 33 less than the Camaro.
__________________
Dave Ficacci 1013 STK 1170 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Dave, please explain the "flat hood" deal to me on the LS1 '98-02 Camaros and Firebirds....The hood scoops on the '98-'02 SS Camaros/TransAm Ram Air cars come non-functional, correct? Does NHRA let people running the SS or Ram Air-scooped cars make them functional? Flat hoods are Z-28 and non ram-air Firebird/Trans Am models, correct? I had 2, Camaro SS (scooped) cars, a '99, and a '02....Racing in bracket mode, I always used a stock, but modified air filter box and picked up ducted fresh air from lower air dam area of nose in front of radiator, directly into the air box assy.....That's probably not legal for NHRA stock class racing, correct? Just what DO they allow, as far as fresh air intake on these cars, and what they DON'T, and exactly what changes the hp ratings on these cars? ..Much thanks. WJ
Last edited by W J; 07-09-2010 at 02:52 PM. Reason: add content.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|