HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2010, 01:27 PM   #1
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris "drooze" Wertman View Post
Nope....no kaboom.

Nothing other than getting ready and finishing my house.

Just havent had a computer around, they dont react well to drywall dust and wood chips.

We got a driver.....a 2 time world Champ

Came out of "retirment" to race for us ..... actually Hiatus is more like it.

Stand up guy......
Keith Lynch?
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 01:34 PM   #2
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

As far as the rule on rocker ratio. I think what the HRA’S need to do is measure the valve lift at the rocker. Measure the lift at the cam. Do the math if the ratio is correct or under they are legal. If it is over they are out. No matter what it says on the rocker.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 01:54 PM   #3
Alex Denysenko
Senior Member
 
Alex Denysenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan City IN
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

I have a question?

What if the rockers are under spec?

We all know that there isn't a factory rocker arm that comes close to spec out of the box so what if your 1.6 ratio factory rockers come up 1.54 or 1.5 rockers are 1.46 etc?

Should you be bounced then also?
__________________
Alex Denysenko NHRA 3038 SS, 3305 STK - IHRA 6 SS, 330A STK
Moneymaker Racing LaPorte Indiana 219-861-1214
www.moneymakerracing.net
Alex Denysenko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 02:08 PM   #4
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 615
Liked 1,937 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Denysenko View Post
I have a question?

What if the rockers are under spec?

We all know that there isn't a factory rocker arm that comes close to spec out of the box so what if your 1.6 ratio factory rockers come up 1.54 or 1.5 rockers are 1.46 etc?

Should you be bounced then also?
I got bounced once for an intake valve being to small by .001 No tollerance given there.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 02:17 PM   #5
Paul Precht
Senior Member
 
Paul Precht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 360
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Pearson View Post
I got bounced once for an intake valve being to small by .001 No tollerance given there.
I thought there was a + or - .005" tolerance on valves unless the rule was changed, Paul.
Paul Precht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 04:16 PM   #6
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Smile Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Precht View Post
I thought there was a + or - .005" tolerance on valves unless the rule was changed, Paul.
Last time I looked the rule was + .001/ - .005. This rule came about due to the 426 Hemis having a problem with the valves clipping each other in S/S with the high lift cams. Dave Wren was bounced at Gainesville when I worked for NHRA in 1974 because of this. His valves were several thou undesized for clearance.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 03:01 PM   #7
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Denysenko View Post
I have a question?

What if the rockers are under spec?

We all know that there isn't a factory rocker arm that comes close to spec out of the box so what if your 1.6 ratio factory rockers come up 1.54 or 1.5 rockers are 1.46 etc?

Should you be bounced then also?
Alex in my senario you would be fine with a 1.54 ratio when it calls for a 1.5. From what I understand from the earlier thread you can make up for the rocker with the cam lift. My guess is that is fine as there is probably no advantage to having a lesser ratio.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 04:09 PM   #8
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Smile Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Denysenko View Post
I have a question?

What if the rockers are under spec?

We all know that there isn't a factory rocker arm that comes close to spec out of the box so what if your 1.6 ratio factory rockers come up 1.54 or 1.5 rockers are 1.46 etc?

Should you be bounced then also?
No......That is legal for stock. Anything goes in S/S.

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 06-17-2010 at 04:12 PM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 06:44 AM   #9
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,836 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Denysenko View Post
I have a question?

What if the rockers are under spec?

We all know that there isn't a factory rocker arm that comes close to spec out of the box so what if your 1.6 ratio factory rockers come up 1.54 or 1.5 rockers are 1.46 etc?

Should you be bounced then also?
Alex, if you read the posts by Travis Miller in the thread I linked above, you'll see that the ratio spec given is the maximum ratio allowed, and if you have less than the maximum ratio, you're fine, and you can make it up with lift at the cam lobe. If the spec is 1.6:1, and you have 1.61:1, you're illegal, but if the spec is 1.6:1 and you have 1.52:1, you're fine. You just cannot exceed the maximum allowed ratio.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 08:29 AM   #10
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: Drooze & Teuton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Alex, if you read the posts by Travis Miller in the thread I linked above, you'll see that the ratio spec given is the maximum ratio allowed, and if you have less than the maximum ratio, you're fine, and you can make it up with lift at the cam lobe. If the spec is 1.6:1, and you have 1.61:1, you're illegal, but if the spec is 1.6:1 and you have 1.52:1, you're fine. You just cannot exceed the maximum allowed ratio.
Thats what I said.....lol.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.