HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2010, 09:12 PM   #1
Bill Howell
Sponsor
 
Bill Howell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 316
Likes: 28
Liked 218 Times in 61 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

The Boss 429 engines were in the Torino Talledega and Cyclone Spoiler II bodies in Nascar in 1969. Ford built the Talledega and Spoiler II long nosed bodies to make them legal and the Boss 429 Mustangs to make the engines legal in Nascar. The engines and bodies each had to have a minimum of 500 units.
__________________

Bill Howell 2059 STK
Bill Howell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 09:22 PM   #2
rawhide
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geerhead55 View Post
I don't recall the Boss 429s doing well in NASCAR,,they had the Torino Cobras on the Ford side(remember Richard Petty was stolen away for one year from Plymouth and drove a Cobra) and on the Mercury side there were the Cyclones( David Pearson and Buddy Baker? I could be wrong) that were the dominant body styles from Dearborn on the NASCAR tracks. If there were any Boss 429s out there I've forgotten about them.
I think Sam Auxier ran one in a class called Ultra/Stock (a forerunner to Pro Stock),in another association. I'm sure someone more NASCAR savvy than me will come on here and set us straight. Danny Durham
Danny,
In 1969 Ford and Mercury won 30 out of 54 races held. Most of those were with the Boss429 although the first few were still with the tunnel port 427.
thanks, Roland
rawhide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 09:39 PM   #3
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

As a modern stocker, I'll bet the NHRA acceptable rods are something much better and much lighter than OEM. That alone has to wake that engine up. Same with modern piston and rings. And probably a better crank forging. I'm just assuming that's all in the tech bulletin as I didn't bother to look.
426 Hemis never used to run in the 9's in Stock either...
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.