HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2009, 05:57 AM   #1
BlueOval Ralph
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

1976 C/SM there were 39 car fro the first round of class, back then you Had to win cass to run in Elminator


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
If this was answered and I missed it, I appoligize. yes, that is the same Mike Edwards. I'm in Tulsa, Mike's race shop is about fifteen miles from my business. It's located between Broken arrow and Coweta. Two small towns next to Tulsa. My C/SM Camaro was a blast, but as Rich said, it about broke me. I finally had to give up in 1979. I began break parts much faster than I could buy them. If I had any sense, I would have stayed away. Super Stock now is not near as much fun as Modified was then. Unless you luck into a heads-up, it's become basically a friggin bracket race. You had to actually know how to make one fast then, and most guys did their own work. Not nearly as many "check book" racers as now. If you weren't reasonably fast you went home real early. One year at Indy there were so many C/SMs, if I remember correctly, seems like they ran a round of us the day before the other classes to thin us out. I took one of my too-frequent naps in the semis of class. I remember like fifty C/MP, C/SM, and I think about that many F/MP in different years. I remember Dick Moroso in C/MP with his Vette "Spastic Plastic". Very nice guy. More cars than classes then. Nowhere to hide from the fast guys. Somebody fast in every class. Now NHRA has become like the old AHRA, way too many classes.

Btw, Billy Mansell put his on the pedal wood when the 1st amber came on, and held it there until time to go. Billy was one of the nicest racers I ever met. Really a great guy. His mechanical tach's tattle-tail was always past ten grand after a run. Pete Smith's too. Loved to watch those cars. With those 50lb flywheels, some guys might have had a problem with these new three amber trees.
BlueOval Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 07:00 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueOval Ralph View Post
1976 C/SM there were 39 car fro the first round of class, back then you Had to win cass to run in Elminator
Yes, and not so many classes to hide in from the fast guys. Don't remember many, if any, singles for class. More like real racing then, not et brackets. I still have a problem putting the words bracket and racing in the same sentence.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 07:59 PM   #3
Lyn Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 282
Liked 968 Times in 194 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

Recently came across a picture of A.Fadelys Maverick that is being restored by a guy in Oh.Looks real nice.I think it was on the H.A.M.B. site.
Lyn Smith is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 07:53 PM   #4
BRIAN SEATE
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

Modified Corvettes 57-67 are my favorites. Stick shift with a small block and lots of R.P.M. A big block example would be Bob Thompson with a 67 427- 1973 Indy winner. That was a cool story,have an old magazine with him in it. My 2 cents.
BRIAN SEATE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 10:12 AM   #5
Mike Keener
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 102
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

I have been reading this thread with great interest and about all I can add is a word about breakage. Yes it's true these cars would break some parts but if the class were run today you wouldn't see nearly as much because of product improvement in three major areas.

1. First and foremost the clutch. Clutches are so much less violent than the Long Style/Borg and Beck stuff we used to run it's pathetic. Knowing what we know now..man what a difference.

2. Transmissions are far superior today. In the beginning we used to run Borg Warner Super T10 transmissions! Can you imagine how much difference there is between them and todays Jerico & G Force transmissions used today. Hell even the 9310 Nickel alloy geared Chrysler 4 speed, and the 5 speed Nash stuff that we ran in later years of Modified could never stand up to todays transmissions. However, Much of the transmission breakage experienced by most racers in that era was a direct bi-product of "too much clutch" syndrome.

3. Valve train components. Sometimes it is hard for me to imagine what we expected of these engines when I look back at the crude stuff we had to work with in this area. We had a Jomar stud girdle, and some roller rockers, and very breakable valve springs that we expected to twist nearly 10,000 RPM. Oh sure they did it all right, but you get my drift. Jessel Rocker Shaft systems, better springs...man I wish we had that stuff back then.

MK
__________________
Mike Keener
A/S B/S
C/SM
Mike Keener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 06:25 PM   #6
mloboda
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: cleveland Ohio
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

The closest thing to modified production you will see today is a UMTR race.
This video from the UMTR Milan 7/18/09 race is good viewing.
Be patient with the download. The clip is 50 minutes long.

http://tinyurl.com/md5dxx
mloboda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 06:58 AM   #7
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

go youtube 11000 rpm 289 if you want to see old style mod racing, no breakout stuff that went on as late as last year.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 01:31 PM   #8
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Keener View Post
I have been reading this thread with great interest and about all I can add is a word about breakage. Yes it's true these cars would break some parts but if the class were run today you wouldn't see nearly as much because of product improvement in three major areas.

1. First and foremost the clutch. Clutches are so much less violent than the Long Style/Borg and Beck stuff we used to run it's pathetic. Knowing what we know now..man what a difference.

2. Transmissions are far superior today. In the beginning we used to run Borg Warner Super T10 transmissions! Can you imagine how much difference there is between them and todays Jerico & G Force transmissions used today. Hell even the 9310 Nickel alloy geared Chrysler 4 speed, and the 5 speed Nash stuff that we ran in later years of Modified could never stand up to todays transmissions. However, Much of the transmission breakage experienced by most racers in that era was a direct bi-product of "too much clutch" syndrome.

3. Valve train components. Sometimes it is hard for me to imagine what we expected of these engines when I look back at the crude stuff we had to work with in this area. We had a Jomar stud girdle, and some roller rockers, and very breakable valve springs that we expected to twist nearly 10,000 RPM. Oh sure they did it all right, but you get my drift. Jessel Rocker Shaft systems, better springs...man I wish we had that stuff back then.

MK

So my earlier posts about breakage and costs to keep your car running are not really exaggerated and Mike Keener agrees. Hard work is only going to be a part of the equation. If you have no parts to replace the ones you broke becaue you don't have the money to buy them your sidelined. You can't fix broken clutches, transmissions, rear ends or broken valvetrains strictly with "hard work"........and plenty of local racers did not have "connections" to more than one source for info, parts, machine work etc......Those that stated that all it took was effort to be competetive are not really telling it like it was. The /SM classes were supposed to be a "budget" like the Econo Dragsters.....nothing "econo" about either of them real quickly after they were instituted. It is the same today in Stock and SuperStock........try runnning as fast as they are at Indy today and yesterday with some sort of home built deal and let me know how you make out.......You can work till your fingers bleed and you won't make the field without the "right stuff" under the hood and behind the engine.......
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 02:05 PM   #9
Scotty D
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

rich you are right about the times and how hard you had to work and how much money it took to campaign one of these cars,but alot of us have fond memories of these cars and always will.you are a glass half empty kind of guy and the rest of us are the half full kind.on a scale comparison it would be like trying to run a comp car now,but as mike kenner said everything is so much more bullet proof compared to what was used back then.i know guys that run stick cars in the umtr that work on them less than you work on your dragster.the director of the south chapter has a 79 z-28 that weighs in at 3400 lbs and runs 9.40's at 142 and 60ft at 1.29 he's put over 400 passes on the rearend and trans with no problems.also david manning runs superstock in one of those home built ones and runs fast enough to get in the field, so the beauty is in the eye of the beholder and can be done both ways.in todays times with the quality of the parts out there it would be much cheaper to run one of these cars.the difference in cost now is driven up by the 18 to 10 degree heads and manifolds, if some one were to resurrect this class and limit the cylinder heads to keep the cost down it could be affordable for someone to put together one and run it.maybe the fans and the fun would come back to drag racing.
Scotty D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 12:52 PM   #10
Powerlock
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Last Year of Modified? Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyn Smith View Post
Recently came across a picture of A.Fadelys Maverick that is being restored by a guy in Oh.Looks real nice.I think it was on the H.A.M.B. site.



Here you go.... http://www.competitionplus.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11549&Itemid=6



Or this one.... http://www.boss302.com/smf/index.php?topic=25741.0

Last edited by Powerlock; 09-03-2009 at 01:00 PM.
Powerlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.