HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2009, 09:41 AM   #1
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Meyer View Post
In talking to my div tech director this how it is no nhra person saw what happened so no hp hit. However new langauge is beinng writen as far as 1.40 under. Kind of closeing the barn door after the horse got out. So untill we see somthing in writing the matter is dead. I think his veiw was it has to be seen by someone from nhra and it is ilegal to take out wieght of taint a fuel sample to void a run. I also found out the hard way that only Nal event runs count for ahfs averages. On fri before teching in I asked the div tech director and div director if div runs counted on the average and was told yes then after my fist run on sat I was told that they had called Cal and now it was nal only so much for that.So now with so few cars in the average there maybe a lot of hp given out unless you had your car painted in Cal. Tom Meyer
So, we can run as fast as we want at div races, as long as we stay off that 1.40 trigger, without hurting our AHFS averages?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 10:14 AM   #2
larry dowty
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: chewelah wa
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

WHAT happened to kevin cours post on this matter?
__________________
larry dowty 6388 SS
larry dowty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 10:15 AM   #3
Tom Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 936
Likes: 78
Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Thats my take on it Ed. It is now a three person board Bruce Danny and I can not rember the other so like I said maybe you need your car painted in Cal. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ???
Tom Meyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 12:06 PM   #4
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,931
Likes: 407
Liked 2,052 Times in 400 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Tom -- I don't agree with your anology as I'm probably one of the few on this board who has had his car painted in California and it hasn't helped me over the years one bit -- not one little bit .. ever......

PS-- I really hate to admit it but I got some very nice paint work .
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Scan0227.JPG
Views:	164
Size:	29.0 KB
ID:	843  
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 02:25 PM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,762 Times in 1,741 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Jack, not one itsy, bitsy bit ever? Ever?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 07:56 AM   #6
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,931
Likes: 407
Liked 2,052 Times in 400 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Exclamation Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Jack, not one itsy, bitsy bit ever? Ever?
Billy -- Nothing -- Nada -- Zip -- Zero..........if anything it was harder on me ......................If you remember I've already taken the 1.40 hit on Monday ........maybe I should have tried this weight / water deal instead .
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 10:51 AM   #7
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,931
Likes: 407
Liked 2,052 Times in 400 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Talking Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Ed -- Thanks for the offer but we have plenty of good painters here in the East . At the time my GTO served as a "West Coast" car and burned up pretty good at Pomona.........when "they" were done you couldn't tell it was ever on fire and still retained all of the original sheetmetal ...............
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 06:53 PM   #8
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

I have a dumb question. If somebody (like Sorenson) just wanted to know how quick his car was capable of running that day, why not just pull 25 or 30 lbs BEFORE the pass? No funny stuff on the return road, etc.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA

Last edited by Ed Wright; 05-26-2009 at 07:01 PM. Reason: Dumb Okie spelling...
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 08:21 PM   #9
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

So, let me get this straight:

Henson runs 1.40 under, avoids the scales, so nobody knows whether he was light, but gets HP ANYWAY, on Monday.

Sorensen runs 1.40 under, but comes up "light", and DOES NOT get HP.

Would somebody explain to me in what ways these two scenarios differ?

In neither case could it be verified that these two cars were of legal weight.

One gets HP, and the other doesn't.

New language isn't going to fix this....
__________________
Bill
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 08:37 PM   #10
hadtobethere
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thumbs up Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

....this is another good reason to lower the S/SS index -.50 .....then throw away the AFHS and get back to real racing...the way it should be.
hadtobethere is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.