|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
When Sport Compact was created, it was asked if there would be a Stock eliminator. The answer was a definite NO. The reason given was it would be too much of a hardship on the younger racers to have to teardown their engines to prove they were legal. The younger group supposedly wanted only heads-up racing with very little class structure. Well the powers in charge listened to them and we can see where Sport Compact is today. Thousands of potential young racers to grow from and a few high dollar teams ran everyone off.....forever. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Even heads up classes need tech (teardown) to be legal.
__________________
Tim Kish 3032 SS/GS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
The real story is probably nhra didn't want to put extra help to tear cars down. I knew some racers that were building cars for the sport compact stuff, but the toterhomes and the stacker trailers scared them away. And believe it or not even with all the factory help. There is a guy in Canada that is using 20 year old car and parts that has ran as fast and faster than the factory teams.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|