|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wi
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Keep the tire rule at 9" ! Use the NHRA & IHRA classes alike for stk and ss, my suggestion! John....
__________________
John Lang 365 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The view I'm taking, you're cross polinating here, so some cars have already been built under one rule structure. Some might take it that using the IHRA rules makes it more liberal. The 9 inch tire really won't bother me, that's been my plan from the beginning. As I've stated, I'm building a crate motor car. I do want to keep it within the confines of NHRA rules, in case I decide one day to build a 301 Pontiac or 403 Oldsmobile motor. To me that's another issue, what about those of us that populate these classes, crate motor and GT. Since I can't run NHRA events with this car as a crate motor or GT stocker. My option to use the rules that are allowed, give me a little more leeway than the guy running a car that competes in NHRA. If I chose to take advantage of them. Robert Swartz
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro 95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock Last edited by Robert Swartz; 03-04-2009 at 03:49 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I couldn't agree more. If you want fat tires, narrowed rearends and moved in frame rails theres Super stock. It ain't stock. Course you could still run stocker tires but it could be a handfull with the narrow track. Sort of like driving with one of those inflateaspares on.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 03-04-2009 at 08:34 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Yes I know that some of the NHRA cars and IHRA cars also have slightly narrowed rear housings. Who really cares as long as it looks correct. I was just saying that the amount they moved the leaf spring for side wall clearence was usually less than 3/4 of an inch on each side. This is in comparison with all of the body work required to fit a 9 inch stocker tire on some body styles. In time I hope IHRA changes the wording in thier rule book. A 9 inch radial is quicker than the 10.5's anyway.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 03-05-2009 at 11:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 147
Likes: 19
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
IDRA Independent Drag Racer Alliance
Bunch the abc, def, ghi etc. together for the Saturday afternoon class run-offs, no handy capped starts, more heads-up racing. Heads-up format is marketable. Run the class winners off together for the big event braggin rights Saturday night. Bunch everyone together Sunday afternoon for a Stock/Superstock combo bracket race. My 2 cents, Mike Szcz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I too, could have phrased differently the wording. I guess it was a bit misleading. If your not familiar with IHRA rules, there are some differences. I don't see the rule differences being so substantial that we all can't come to some compromises and have a race. As Terry stated, IHRA rules allow minor inboard movement of the springs. And I took that from the rulebook. Here again, the car I'm building, a 1979 Firebird, I have no intention of running anything larger than the 9" tires. No, you are NOT allowed a narrowed rear end. Now, something I've heard but can't substantiate, is some guys have mini-tubbed stockers in IHRA? Maybe someone currently racing can clear that up for me? Here again, I wouldn't do it because I one day may want to build either a 301 Pontiac or a 403 Oldsmobile engine to run NHRA events. I want my car to retain it's versatility. On another note, even though I don't presently have a car ready to race. IF I had a say on the name. I like the CRA = Class Racers Association. That's my two jingling penny's. Robert Swartz
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro 95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 452
Likes: 113
Liked 125 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
Mini tub's are for front drive conversion crate motor stockers.
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Correct.... ...and which there are only 4 of in the country. Not sure about Wright's Probe and Mace's new Sunfire, but I believe the Ross's Avenger and Sebring fit their 9" tires within the stock wheelwell.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|