HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-12-2009, 03:26 PM   #11
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 712
Liked 1,572 Times in 580 Posts
Default Re: SFI Scattersheild meeting

Some years ago, I challenged SFI on the 2 year requirement. I collected data from S/SS and Comp stick shift racers. Also, I took a Lakewood bellhousing, did extensive structural analysis and gave the data to NHRA.

After a telephone discussion with NHRA, they asked me to submit and talk to SFI. What a joke!!!
Spent 30 minutes with SFI's Arnie Kuhns and he could not come up with a single piece of factual or historical data on S/SS or Comp classes. The criteria SFI based their finding and requiremnt was from circle track and off-road racing vehicles for which they did not have a requirement for a SFI approved flywheel or clutch assembly in their rules. Many of these classes were still running OEM or Chinesium flywheels/clutches. Due to their failures, SFI applied the requirement as a general rule to all motorsports requirements.

NHRA has the authority to use the SFI requirements as a "Guideline" or "Suggestion" and extend the requirement as they deem appropriate for S/SS and Comp classes.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.