|
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,132
Likes: 1,601
Liked 1,912 Times in 429 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Chuck, The AA/S and AA/SA classes were created for the old cars, such as the ZL-1, the Hemi cars, the 427/425, and a few other combinations, before the new cars came to Stock Eliminator. Several racers running the older cars in A/S and A/SA went to Len Imbrogno and asked for a 7.0 or 7.5 pounds per HP class. At the time, some of the Hemi cars were at 445 HP, as was the ZL-1, the L-88 was at 440. We (Kevin Cradduck and I) were running a 427/425 with the 401 heads at the time, factored at 435, and we had a ZL-1 in pieces in the shop. The 7.5# weight break was agreed upon, and then the index was set at 10.90, the idea being the cars could be run hard, and put some nice numbers on the scoreboards for the fans, without everyone ending up being factored at 450+ HP. We ran AA/SA almost exclusively for a while, as I was one of the first of the people who asked for the class, because we were building the ZL-1 at the time. Within two years or so, the new cars were in Stock Eliminator, and all the indexes were lowered 0.30 across the board. Yes, it would certainly be wise and fair to raise the AA/S and AA/SA indexes to somewhere around 10.75, or better still, 10.80. The current 10.60 index would be fine, if the weight break was 7.0#, which some had suggested to begin with. The problem with a 7.0# weight break is that it would stop about 1/2 of the cars (or even more than 1/2) that are eligible now from running AA/S and AA/SA. Not a good solution. When NHRA first stated their intention to move the new cars into their own classes, several racers suggested that the older cars get a 7.0# class as well as keeping the 7.5# class, to allow the cars factored at 435-440 and up to run at 7.0# and run off the 10.60 index. They shot that idea down quickly.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|