HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > .90 Heads Up Class Racing
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-11-2013, 07:00 PM   #11
Stewart Way
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 476
Likes: 20
Liked 70 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: NHRA 2013 Rules Amendments

Think you are right. I remember collector extensions that were slip on but every collector I have had bolted on to 2 primary tubes. I see some stainless ones with spring attachments. Just too many words to say "collector". We know what they are saying but why not just say collector, not multi-piece exhaust collector? But Mr Tech Man, I don't need them because I have a 1 piece collector, not multi-piece. I was an NHRA tech man for years and this is what causes problems. Poorly worded rules or should I say wording open for arguement.
And are these really better-safer. Both do the job if they are secured but neither if they are not. I'm just being picky I guess.
__________________
Stewart Way 2424 SS
Stewart Way is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.