HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-24-2012, 04:34 PM   #23
Aubrey N Bruneau
Member
 
Aubrey N Bruneau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Eastern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 311
Likes: 6
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Aubrey N Bruneau
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
That's not directed at you, personally, Aubrey, but rather a general statement.
Yeah ? YEAH ? !
HEE HEE !
maybe I know less than that ?

I'm just sayin... It seems to me that much of the reason NHRA removed the spring pressure and duration rules, was to simplify inspection and enforcement. Of course it changed things. This rocker allowance can be simplified too. Merely have a ratio tolerance... IE; +/- .05, and if lift at valve checks ok... we're good.
I understand that "ingenious" folks may discover advantages one way or another. Positioning of the fulcrum-point for one. Shaft rocker setups are probably more stable, but stud rockers are more user friendly.

I dunno
maybe I'm just simple ?!
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S
62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409
Aubrey N Bruneau is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.