HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-30-2009, 11:20 AM   #30
Mike Carr
VIP Member
 
Mike Carr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Enon Valley PA
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 234
Liked 83 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mike Carr Send a message via MSN to Mike Carr Send a message via Yahoo to Mike Carr
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

There are so many things that need changed with the AHFS system, I wouldn't know where to start. But I'll answer Billy's question first, with two possible answers.

A) For the first -1.40 under run a car makes, give them the current 3.25% adjustment. That would give it a quick smack now. For each successive run a racer makes of -1.40, up the percentage. Maybe 4 or 5%, with no regard to the "factoring session, first half or second). However, if a racer was to go more than 1.40 once, there is a good chance he/she may not do it again...sandbag or whatever. So:

B) Or, the opposite could be applied. Make the first hit more severe (4 or 5%) to possibly get said combination in line quicker, than they could revert back to the 3.25% for each successive hit, or even leave the higher 4-5% hit in place for successive hits. This would probably be better for what Billy is suggesting. The only bad thing is, if a racer with a combination not considered to be soft could get hit if there is Class Eliminations at a race with mineshaft air. For example, an A/SA 69 Camaro 427/425-425. Many would not consider this a soft combination. But, if Bobby DeArmond or anyone was to go -1.40 in Class, it gets 14 HP and 112 pounds (at 3.25%), that probably isn't deserved? It would help bring in line the soft combos, but could also hurt undeserving ones.

Another thing I was thinking about over the weekend (I may be wrong on this). Once a car currently goes more than -1.40 under, it gets 3.25%. But that's where it ends, right? It doesn't go any higher? So if a racer was to run -1.43 under while still holding some, he/she could then later say "Well, since I'm getting hit anyway, I'll go out and go -1.65 under and won't get hit anymore than going -1.43". Shouldn't there be a scale? Example: Runs of -1.400 to -1.499 get 3.25%. Runs of -1.500 to -1.599 get x-percent, Runs of -1.600 to -1.699 get x-percent and so on? Similar to the CIC in Comp Eliminator. I do agree with others, that any comination running more than -1.40 under should have to pass a teardown, to make sure that it was legal.

Just some thoughts...
__________________
Mike Carr, Tri-State S/SS Association President
Looking for 2015 S/SS Race Sponsors Contact me if interested
buffdaddy_1302@hotmail.com (724) 510-5912
Mike Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.