|
![]() |
#31 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 264
Likes: 1,168
Liked 354 Times in 79 Posts
|
![]()
My two cents, I am not in favor of ditching traditional SS and Stock shipping weights. Yes the old GT shipping weight rules were obtuse( vehicle shipping weight +/- 250lbs ÷ engine factored HP to get Power to Weight & and even if a car fit a class it couldn't always get to run at the bottom or minimum of that class if it didn't fit the bottom of the class) but the traditional SS and Stock shipping weights rules are much more straight forward. Find your car's combo power to weight. See what class weight break it fits and you run one class lighter or one class heavier. Simple.
I think If you do away with shipping weights than there will be a whole lot more of dodging going on. Jumping to classes to avoid potential heads up. It certainly will be easier to do. Also some combos will receive a big advantage. For example the 4th gen LS1 Firebirds in SS. Auto Ram air cars fit F,G,H at 319hp. Flat hoods H,I,J at 305. You telling me that ever Ram air car is not going to switch a flat hood and get 14hp off their combo the first day that shipping weights are done away with? I am sure there is others that will benefit also. Not exactly fair to other competitors running against those combos. Finally I think it would cause more of a problem with people lighten their cars then running super heavy. Exotic materials (Carbon Fiber, Titanium, Aluminum, etc) aren't cheap and like most relaxing of the rules done in the past by NHRA will drive the cost of keeping a competitive car up dramatically. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
|
![]()
Billy this has to be the worst-case scenario I have seen in Stock and Super Stock in its 60 plus years of existence. I would not want to be the one that makes the decision on how to straighten this mess out. You can say just go back and put all the right info in. But where does it end. Do you get rid of the aluminum drive shaft that the 67 Shelby Mustangs get to use because years later Shelby added them as an option on the car? If someone was to go back and right all that is wrong, they may spend the next 5 years trying to figure it all out. And for everything they try to correct someone will come up with a reason to justify why it was done that way to begin with. It's uglier than ugly. I hate to see more rule changes and I would hate to see us lose any more racers. I hope they are able to come up with a solution that will affect us races in the least possible way. I hate to see them do away with shipping weights but at this point it has to be on the table. It's not the right thing to do but it may be the only thing they are able to do. You like to pick on my car and that's ok. Could you imagine how many others will start to nitpick on other cars if their car gets effected after they have been running it that way for years. It will start a war between all of us racers that I would hate to see. And so would the Powers to be. You see some of the post it's already started. That itself could end what is still left to Stock and Super Stock. Think about it sometimes what you wish for ends up being the biggest mistake. I want what's in best interest for the long-term health of our class. BP
Last edited by B Parker; 02-14-2022 at 12:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
Charlie,personally I would like to go one class lighter myself,I just gave an argument to think about, not thinking about myself so much
![]() ps. We have met, and I like you ![]()
__________________
Stop global whining |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 1,919
Liked 10,681 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
![]()
Y’all get the rules fixed and I will race by those rules. If the rules get to crazy there are other places to race.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#35 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 2,550
Liked 2,626 Times in 950 Posts
|
![]()
For a non-contestant like me all this controversy is disheartening and would keep me from racing a stocker again if I chose to.
I see the merit in both Charley's and Billy's points of view but naively wish the clock could be turned back and we all know that never happens. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 980
Likes: 17
Liked 228 Times in 70 Posts
|
![]()
Well put Mr. Larry! Do what needs to be done and we will go from there. Just not sure why they make all these sudden changes that affect so many people. Hopefully they give us a little more heads up that way I know if I need to start building a new car or not!
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Englewood, Florida
Posts: 989
Likes: 35
Liked 316 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
If they give us a heads up notice of what is coming, then you realize that you better start building that electrical Super Stocker.
__________________
Ron Ortiz 2102 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 314
Liked 1,102 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
Seems that some racers would like to see Stock "evolve" into Comp, but with advertised HP rather than cubic inches. Oh yeah, and stock valve size and lift, with no hood scoops. I know there are already too many classes, but with the barn doors getting opened more every year, I pine for a time when racers liked Stock, for the challenge for working with, and around, the weaknesses of the combination that they chose, retaining ALL the factory components, of an actual package that was readily available to anybody to walk into any new car dealership, and drive home. I wish things were more like Junior Stock was, than Factory Stock and "enhanced" Stock has become.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 500
Likes: 1,028
Liked 988 Times in 272 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And as racers find something that may affect them. They deflect and bring something else up that may affect someone else. And then it goes on and on and on. If you don't think the NHRA staff who make/change the rules don't read this stuff, you are mistaken. We will all deal with whatever changes come down the pike, but don't believe someone is sitting behind a desk thinking what they can come up with to screw with us next.. These things are a reaction to someone else's actions. And in that person's view, it may be warranted, but it comes with a price as we can see, and the posts keep coming in.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT Last edited by 1347; 02-14-2022 at 02:21 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#40 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,808
Likes: 2,899
Liked 5,109 Times in 1,947 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
They'd eliminate ALL of us if they could.. You don't want to combine and eliminate half the classes..Don't give them the ammo to shoot us with. Plus combining stick and auto and eliminating half pounds will totally screw up the combo races.. Most seem to want heads up runs, but wait till it's every other pair. The budget guys who can't or won't go to 8-9 points meets will drop out of the local stuff too, don't you think, Charlie Bob? This is not the way to re- imagine class win payouts , if that's where we're going with this. But that's another thread...
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|