HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2014, 08:59 AM   #21
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 613
Liked 1,916 Times in 574 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Markow View Post
just like we all needed new window nets before , and they changed there mind. how many bought new nets for no reason.
I have been stung on both of these issues. I really don't balk on any safety requirements. I work in the construction industry and this is nothing in comparison to OSHA.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 10:05 AM   #22
farmco r/sa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: lakewood, co
Posts: 558
Likes: 302
Liked 147 Times in 54 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by deuces wild View Post
So my nuts and bolts are good now?
this seems nuts......
__________________
Randy Hyman. Lakewood co. stk 5394
P/SA
farmco r/sa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 10:10 AM   #23
Randall Klein
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Look Brett, I admire your history and passion for the sport, however I find your veiled historical snarky comments a little tiring....and not the Boertman comment alone either

At Topeka got ran over by a kid on a mini scooter, at Denver, in the restricted area under the tower, got a rock off a burnout just above the eye, and on and on over 25 years....stuff happens, and if you've been around for awhile there's plenty of danger at the strip

A nanny state tries to insulate all from any possible consequences....maybe those worried about any potential harm should take up curling...oh wait! There was an injury in curling...maybe just stay in bed
Randall Klein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 10:30 AM   #24
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,281
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Klein View Post
Look Brett, I admire your history and passion for the sport, however I find your veiled historical snarky comments a little tiring....and not the Boertman comment alone either

At Topeka got ran over by a kid on a mini scooter, at Denver, in the restricted area under the tower, got a rock off a burnout just above the eye, and on and on omver 25 years....stuff happens, and if you've been around for awhile there's plenty of danger at the strip

A nanny state tries to insulate all from any possible consequences....maybe those worried about any potential harm should take up curling...oh wait! There was an injury in curling...maybe just stay in bed
True enough.
I am glad NHRA finally opened their eyes to other acceptable solutions to reduce risk and improve safety. Hopefully, they will learn to take a more reasonable approach to this in the future. If you recall, NHRA was suppossed to be dedicated to safety. That does not mean that all risk is eliminated.
I am sure that top management did not want to perform the due diligence that would have landed them where they are now.
I have said it before. The upper management at NHRA should be facilitating the discussions with qualified experts that they could consult within NHRA, their membership, and others. When they stifle this kind of discussion, they are left with a very narrow range of solutions that carry unintended consequences.
It is a shame that NHRA has no regard for the investment in time and resources that some have put forth in making tethers, but that should not be a surprise.
I think the common sense revision is a good one, and I like it. I just hate the way they got there. It is the same process that affects much of their decision making. I love class racing, I really hope that some changes are made in key positions so that the direction of the association meets the needs of the racers and fans. Even though NHRA dominates now, it will ultimately be replaced in some fashion if they continue to miss the mark on every opportunity. Time for a gut check at the top. Maybe the brass will come out to talk at another National event like they did at Indy. Remember that one....
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK

Last edited by james schaechter; 02-20-2014 at 10:35 AM.
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 10:56 AM   #25
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

what a disaster
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 11:35 AM   #26
fredjohnston
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

I'm not sure about anyone else, but I think I would rather have a nice looking tether or a small weld on my header/collectors than drilling the body/frame and using a tail pipe hanger.

Just my opinion.
fredjohnston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 11:43 AM   #27
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
what a disaster
X100

I still do not understand why the tabs with nuts and bolts that hold the collector to the primary tubes is not enough. Jack Mullins used to hold his collectors on with a bent piece of coat hanger; his never fell off. I figure its a matter of statistical percentages: so .000017% of the number of passes have collector incidents under the old rules. Under the new rules, .000004% will have collector incidents. Wow, I feel so safe now! Totally out of control and reasonable dialog.
Dwight Southerland is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 11:49 AM   #28
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
X100

I still do not understand why the tabs with nuts and bolts that hold the collector to the primary tubes is not enough. Jack Mullins used to hold his collectors on with a bent piece of coat hanger; his never fell off. I figure its a matter of statistical percentages: so .000017% of the number of passes have collector incidents under the old rules. Under the new rules, .000004% will have collector incidents. Wow, I feel so safe now! Totally out of control and reasonable dialog.


I agree. If guys would just use steel self locking nuts (not fiber locks) and keep an eye on them and the welds on the tabs, there would be no problems. Just start to bar the guys that loose them from running any more events, they would pay more attention.
And, I bet Jack used a real good grade coat hanger. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 12:24 PM   #29
gsa612
Senior Member
 
gsa612's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100th Meridian
Posts: 569
Likes: 116
Liked 280 Times in 139 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Now there's a grey area in the definition of the clamp and hanger lol..I was thinking of using a 3 1/2" SS t-bolt clamp on the collector,with a piece of metal strapping to the clamp bolt,and the other side bolted/screwed to the floor.I wonder if that would be acceptable?.What a cluster**** NHRA!.
gsa612 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 12:42 PM   #30
buzzinhalfdozen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Markow View Post
just like we all needed new window nets before , and they changed there mind. how many bought new nets for no reason.
Yes, when I stated my disapproval of that rule I was put in my place by a certain legend of drag racing from the East coast, whom shall remain nameless. While I've realized for a while now drag racing is expensive....why keep piling on? Common sense rules that address REAL issues are fine but you cannot make it risk free it's impossible. There have probably been more people injured on pit vehicles than by collectors falling off, a local man died a year or two ago at our local track in a pit vehicle accident, merely celebrating a win and everything went wrong, tragic yes preventable?......
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117

Last edited by buzzinhalfdozen; 02-20-2014 at 12:59 PM.
buzzinhalfdozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.