HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2009, 07:48 AM   #11
Evan Smith
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Joe,

You are dead on. The new cars are under-rated and will be fast for a while, but so were many others before them—a la LT-1 and LS F-bodies. That deal amounted to years of domination and much griping from many who competed against them. If the new cars were dead slow who would want one? I think it's great for the class, heck Don Garlits is racing Stock Eliminator! Hopefully Chevy will come out with a good combo for the new Camaro so all three new cars can do battle.

Once they (Mustang and Challenger) go fast they will get HP and be sucked back to reality until the next "hot" combo takes over (which could be an older car) and rules the roost. It's an endless cycle, which is why we work on our cars and continue to challenge ourselves to do better. Of course no one wants to get beat, especially those who work hard and spend lots of money, but it's not like they are getting beat (which they haven't yet), by a $5,000 car. A new Mustang of Challenger takes as much, if not more, investment than just about and other AA, A, B or C combo.

Evan
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK
Evan Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:01 AM   #12
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Evan, I had the whole post written and decided to just not post it. It's inconsiderate (though I'm sure unintentional) remarks like that ("getting beat by a $5000 car") that keep me racing. Thank you! I've been slacking off a bit this year and now I have incentive to hit a few races again.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:17 AM   #13
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Guys, the new challenger and the mustang are a whole different breed. Never before have purpose built race cars that you can't license for the street been legal for stock eliminator. You all need to look at these cars and see what I mean. I looked at Irvin's new Cahllenger at Bowling Green this past weekend. It's got a 4 link rear end, a single plane individual runner manifold with a 1000 cfm throttle body, a 600 lift cam, 12 to 1 compression, a fabricated aluminum oil pan, a carbon fiber hood plus racing seats and a whole lot more. What's this sound like? Super Stock maybe. At least the firebirds and camaros with the LT!'s and LS1's were street legal cars. Oh and by the way Irvin did go 9.99 @ 133mph at B weight. They haven't even started on these cars, the motor hasn't even been apart.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:28 AM   #14
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Evan, I had the whole post written and decided to just not post it. It's inconsiderate (though I'm sure unintentional) remarks like that ("getting beat by a $5000 car") that keep me racing. Thank you! I've been slacking off a bit this year and now I have incentive to hit a few races again.
Don't go around telling people you've got $4,000 in cash in the glovebox!
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:51 AM   #15
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 244
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Greg you have hit the nail right on the head......They Should Have Been SuperStock cars just like in the past, they do no fit the spirit of a Stock car.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:57 AM   #16
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Greg, Bob, you both know why they are there! Come on! The $$$ guys wanted them there. You know the type. They don't like losing to $5000 cars. BTW Bob, what is the "spirit of Stock" in the 21st century?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 11:39 AM   #17
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 244
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Their rear setup for one, we got busted when trying a 4 link type setup in the vettes years ago now its ok ? you still can not do it with the 12bolt and the race seats dont fit either, alum pan, intake is not what comes on production car. Billy they just dont fit stock as it is written.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 11:41 AM   #18
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 244
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

I should know better than argue with Billy but what the hell ! Go ahead Beard !!
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 11:49 AM   #19
Chris Hill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 655
Likes: 8
Liked 244 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hill View Post
Guys, the new challenger and the mustang are a whole different breed. Never before have purpose built race cars that you can't license for the street been legal for stock eliminator. You all need to look at these cars and see what I mean. I looked at Irvin's new Cahllenger at Bowling Green this past weekend. It's got a 4 link rear end, a single plane individual runner manifold with a 1000 cfm throttle body, a 600 lift cam, 12 to 1 compression, a fabricated aluminum oil pan, a carbon fiber hood plus racing seats and a whole lot more. What's this sound like? Super Stock maybe. At least the firebirds and camaros with the LT!'s and LS1's were street legal cars. Oh and by the way Irvin did go 9.99 @ 133mph at B weight. They haven't even started on these cars, the motor hasn't even been apart.
I agree 100% with Uncle Greg!
__________________
Chris Hill
https://ihmusedparts.com
Chris Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 11:55 AM   #20
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: Parity in Stock

Bob, no argument here I agree with you completely.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.