|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 640
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
|
![]()
The 80 Z/28 came with air induction air cleaner, I am not running one on my 80 I/S Z/28 now but, was able to find one with the hood ring. Any opinions on what kind of gains I might get with running one
Randy Wells I/S 5628 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]()
What MPH will you be running? I don't think you will see much HP increase from Ram Air. Where most of your HP increase will come from is temperature difference from outside air and under hood air.
Stan |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 640
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,802
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
Our Mopar A bodies are NO faster with the Ram Air Hoods (Either years).
But I like how they look! My 69 Hemi Roadrunner ran the same with the Hood intakes Duct Taped up!
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]()
First lets start with not all setups work the same. If we look at the best case (note these results are from a computer simulation).
60 Foot ET = 1.5314 330 Foot ET = 4.5364 1/8 Mile ET = 7.1430 1/8 Mile MPH = 93.9069 1000 Foot ET = 9.4068 1/4 Mile ET = 11.3221 1/4 Mile MPH = 118.0352 With Ram Air 60 Foot ET = 1.5313 330 Foot ET = 4.5335 1/8 Mile ET = 7.1353 1/8 Mile MPH = 94.1292 1000 Foot ET = 9.3926 1/4 Mile ET = 11.3013 1/4 Mile MPH = 118.4606 Stan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: malden,ma
Posts: 246
Likes: 274
Liked 94 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
If i'm reading this correctly, If you claim the car a 80 Z/28 and don't have a hood with the cowl, It's not a Z/28, and only Z/28 had the 350, just my 2cents.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 640
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
|
![]()
Stan ,
I went ahead and bought a 1980 OEM air cleaner set up, will be going to Topeka on the 19th for TnT. I will do a back to back and see what happens. Will post results. Thanks Randy Wells I/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,104 Times in 302 Posts
|
![]()
Be interesting to see if it does much, if anything. My buddys wife had a 80 ZZ28, and those 2 rectangular opening are quite small, and a fair distance away from the windshield, compared to say, a 69 Camaro Cowl Induction hood. And does anybody know if the 69 Cowl hood really does anything, besides give more space above the carb?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 23
Liked 18 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
I have run my Super Stock 69 Camaro with cowl scoop open and closed.
No difference! |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 640
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
|
![]()
I did some testing today at Heartland Park Topeka, not a good day to test but did get my clutch dialed in. A steady head wind 19MPH gusting to 26. fastest run 11.746 @ 112.54 made 6 runs, slowest 11.82 @110.85, last run of the day with the air induction air cleaner 11.772 @ 111.98 with 22 MPH head wind, and there was no starting line prep, bunch of street cars tracking water to the line all day. May have to try the cowl induction again Thursday in Noble Ok.
Randy Wells I/S 5628 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|