is something wrong with this picture

Mike Savelle · 12-03-2011, 06:42 PM

2010 Mustang ---- 67 Camaro

2.08/160 valves 194/150 valves
5.12/5.12 cam lift 3.90/410 cam lift
roller cam hyd. flat cam
1.62 rockers 1.50 rockers
56cc heads 62cc
fuel injected Qjet
not sure on pushrods ??
NHRA/ 295 hp NHRA/290 hp
both run E/SA

SSGN · 12-03-2011, 07:08 PM

Nope perfectly normal ,did you not click the NOS bottle factory installed on the Camaro???I saw them on paper LOL

Kevin

Maverick · 12-03-2011, 07:29 PM

I got a question about the ford cam lift. Is this on the pushrod side? Or is this a SOHC/DOHC? If it has pushrods, that means the theoretical valve lift would be .829 inches. Am I seeing some thing the wrong way. THAT IS A LOT OF VALVE LIFT TO ME.

eddie c · 12-03-2011, 08:27 PM

What is the difference in the cubic inches of the engines?
ed

Andrew Hill · 12-03-2011, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eddie c

What is the difference in the cubic inches of the engines?
ed

2010 Mustang- 352
1967 Camaro- 350
You forgot the mustang's better heads, intake, and throttle body as well. It has the potential for 9 second runs.

eddie c · 12-03-2011, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Hill

2010 Mustang- 352
1967 Camaro- 350
You forgot the mustang's better heads, intake, and throttle body as well. It has the potential for 9 second runs.

No, I wasn't making light of the situation. I was un sure of the Fords
engine size. I thought it might have been a 4.7 liter motor. I have been out of competition for several years,but there were many similarities
between then and now. Unfortunately the small block Chevy has been
raced and developed over several years,so currently, the Chevy is much closer to its full potential then the Ford.If someone races this Ford
combination next season and gets everything right,hopefully NHRA
will re factor the motor.

Andrew Hill · 12-03-2011, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eddie c

No, I wasn't making light of the situation. I was un sure of the Fords
engine size. I thought it might have been a 4.7 liter motor. I have been out of competition for several years,but there were many similarities
between then and now. Unfortunately the small block Chevy has been
raced and developed over several years,so currently, the Chevy is much closer to its full potential then the Ford.If someone races this Ford
combination next season and gets everything right,hopefully NHRA
will re factor the motor.

I meant the last part as an addition to the original post.

12-03-2011, 06:42 PM	#1
Mike Savelle Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 369 Likes: 125 Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts	is something wrong with this picture 2010 Mustang ---- 67 Camaro 2.08/160 valves 194/150 valves 5.12/5.12 cam lift 3.90/410 cam lift roller cam hyd. flat cam 1.62 rockers 1.50 rockers 56cc heads 62cc fuel injected Qjet not sure on pushrods ?? NHRA/ 295 hp NHRA/290 hp both run E/SA Last edited by Mike Savelle; 12-04-2011 at 08:57 AM. Reason: addition

12-03-2011, 07:08 PM	#2
SSGN Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 646 Likes: 132 Liked 140 Times in 51 Posts	Re: is something wrong with this picture Nope perfectly normal ,did you not click the NOS bottle factory installed on the Camaro???I saw them on paper LOL Kevin

12-03-2011, 07:29 PM	#3
Maverick Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 299 Likes: 3 Liked 36 Times in 26 Posts	Re: is something wrong with this picture I got a question about the ford cam lift. Is this on the pushrod side? Or is this a SOHC/DOHC? If it has pushrods, that means the theoretical valve lift would be .829 inches. Am I seeing some thing the wrong way. THAT IS A LOT OF VALVE LIFT TO ME.

12-03-2011, 08:27 PM	#4
eddie c Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Southeastern Pa. Posts: 53 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: is something wrong with this picture What is the difference in the cubic inches of the engines? ed