|
|
12-10-2023, 11:48 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: shopville kentucky
Posts: 80
Likes: 175
Liked 33 Times in 10 Posts
|
what stock combo is worse (or better) 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
So I had a brain storm ! after reading Billy's budget stocker post last summer, it got me thinking, I have a 69 Camaro streetcar 12 bolt, 4 speed, better axles, slap bars drive shaft loop you know the usual hot rod stuff! but it does not have a roll bar ( I don't want one either) and is by no means a race car! if it had a bar it would open many other possibilities.! anyway, what are your thoughts on this plan! I have a complete 307 carb to pan (I've read this motor combo is very under carbed) and I know of a cheap 250 6 cylinder for sale! what are the chances of putting together one of these 2 motors to build an index running combo on the cheap! (like some machine work,a cam ,good valves and a stocker valve job) not looking to run way under the index! I have plenty of chevy v8 transmissions, converters, shifters ,headers, lite weight race wheels and that kind of stuff laying around , I know Billy has run both these combos in his nova and I hope he chimes in! thanks ....................fred
Last edited by fred goodwin; 12-10-2023 at 01:06 PM. |
12-10-2023, 12:59 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: shopville kentucky
Posts: 80
Likes: 175
Liked 33 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: what stock combo is worse 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
to run the index in P @ 3290lbs with the 307 it would have to make a minimum of 270 hp ! is that even possible with a budget built motor?
|
12-10-2023, 03:32 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Jersey
Posts: 200
Likes: 181
Liked 824 Times in 160 Posts
|
Re: what stock combo is worse 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
Billy has never run a 250 inline 6. Billy (and I) have played with the 230 combo (him much longer than me). We discussed the 250 a few times, and sort of figured the 20 extra cubic inches, but the same 1bbl carb really didn’t equate to a better combo. Billy has done the 72 307, which is a little different than a 69 307. The 230 isn’t too bad. I was able to go .50-60 under with good pistons, a good cam, and a good valve job. Converter and transmission are very important too. Good luck with whatever combo you decide!
__________________
1189 F/SA Defunzalo Racing Enterprises |
Liked |
12-10-2023, 04:27 PM | #4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: shopville kentucky
Posts: 80
Likes: 175
Liked 33 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: what stock combo is worse 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
Quote:
|
|
12-10-2023, 06:31 PM | #5 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cleburne, Texas
Posts: 36
Likes: 121
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: what stock combo is worse 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
Quote:
I bracket raced my camaro for several years with a close to stock combo before deciding to put it into stock eliminator. Good luck.... Or you could sell your car to me, my camaro was the one that I should have kept
__________________
James "jim" Garey Former Texas Motorplex track champion |
|
Liked |
12-10-2023, 07:06 PM | #6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: shopville kentucky
Posts: 80
Likes: 175
Liked 33 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: what stock combo is worse 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
Quote:
|
|
12-10-2023, 07:23 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 206
Likes: 206
Liked 190 Times in 31 Posts
|
Re: what stock combo is worse 1969 250-6 or 307 v8
I dont pretend to know half as much about 6 cyl . as Billy but a 230 @140 in Vsa sure looks better to me than a 307 @ 195 in Psa . If I remember right when Billy ran a 307 in his Nova it was rated @168 hp. Just my opinion Rick
__________________
Rick Winchester Stk 3277 |
Liked |
|
|