|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I have been preaching to folks for years. The Dragster/Funny Car cage is probably responsible for more head injuries and/or deaths than any other part of the race car. The reason is that it's proximity to the drivers head is just a few inches, and being strapped into that tight location keeps your head in between 6 bars to bounce off of! In NASCAR, there are no bars anywhere close to the drivers head. They contain the drivers head as part of the seat construction (which is heavily padded and will give or flex if impacted by the driver. Look at it like this...your head hitting that bar, is like someone with that bar hitting you in the head...NOT GOOD either way.
In my opinion, a horizontal 3-4 inch wide padded band should go from the front bar around behind the drivers head and back out to the front bar on the other side. Kinda like what you see in a NASCAR seat. It could be mounted as such to allow the drivers line of vision just over the top of the pad Wade Mahaffey ![]() Last edited by Wade Mahaffey; 08-21-2014 at 11:32 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 712
Liked 1,568 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 683
Likes: 80
Liked 800 Times in 244 Posts
|
![]()
Probably not the right section for this discussion as this is more of a dragster issue but as it's already started, all the padding in the world isn't going to help when the belts are loose. It is common for the dragster guys to intentionally leave their belts loose so they can get their head outside the cage to better judge the finish line. Go up to top end some time during eliminations and you will regularly see drivers leaned forward with their helmets way past the front hoop. If you put the big pad in place and restrict the driver view even more, I bet they will be leaving the belts looser yet. Not remotely saying it's OK, just good luck on policing this issue, no one thinks they are going to crash and everyone want an advantage when it comes to winning.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 712
Liked 1,568 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Seen it happen and I also wonder why they take such risk. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Incredible photo Wade. I hope people do not wait for a rule change to take action when needed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
From the photo, the foreword section of the cage is keeping his head from kissing the wall. Not a good trade off in my opinion.
It's not just a dragster issue, either. Funny car cages show up in GT cars with front wheel drive conversions and the /SM cars, too. All the SG and ST cars have them. Dale
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 521
Liked 330 Times in 178 Posts
|
![]()
looking at other pics of that car crash it appears for some reason the front wheels jerked upward and that caused the car to get out of shape---while moving around the WHOLE *** end of the car from the back of the trans rearward the frame broke apart--- not sure if welds broke or the crash caused that separation but it appears the driver might of had his belts too loose also--he definately looks to be ahead of the rollbar but definately not totally behind it--FED 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 712
Liked 1,568 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
ROLL-CAGE PADDING Roll-cage padding meeting SFI Spec 45.1 mandatory anywhere driver’s helmet may come in contact with roll-cage components. See General Regulations 4:11. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 521
Liked 330 Times in 178 Posts
|
![]()
I dont think it is a padding issue here its more of the shape of the area that is padded-- a large flat/blunt surface or a small 2 inch round/sharp tubesurface--- the contact point on the round tube is probably 1/2 inch to maybe 5/8 inch whereas the flat padded area contact point is more likely many square inches(8-10)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Peru, IN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The problem with most new style dragsters is convenience. These guys are buying big cars for resale value. There is no need for a 24" wide dragster. Anyone who knows me knows I am a big ol boy and I fit well in a 23" wide car. There is no reason a 200# guy needs a 24" car. These 24"-26" cars are big even on me. My dad crashed his comp car in Memphis in 01 and it was a 20" cage and again he is not exactly a small guy with a 20 suit on he was in there pretty good. the car rolled several times hitting the cage directly on the track several times. Did he get his bell rung yes did he have injuries like the guy in the pic no. No accident is the same but I don't think that we would be getting the broken hips, legs, ribs ect if cars were built to fit like the old days. But the short answer to your original question I personally think fc cages are extremely effective if built properly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|