HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2021, 10:42 PM   #1
Jon Riedel
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default SBC 461 heads

Friend of mine has 2 pair of 461 heads w/1.94 intakes. Does anyone run them & what would they be worth
Jon Riedel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2021, 07:14 AM   #2
nhramnl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 507
Likes: 8
Liked 358 Times in 83 Posts
Default Re: SBC 461 heads

Sadly, probably not a lot. I have a set also, complete with original valves, springs, retainers, etc. in literally perfect shape, with ZERO core shift, and a Corvette guy (327/250??) offered me $300 and acted like he was buying me a house. My experience doesn't establish the market, though (obviously). I was told a number of times that they aren't very important to drag racers anymore.
nhramnl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2021, 08:40 AM   #3
richie 2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 970
Likes: 422
Liked 204 Times in 93 Posts
Default Re: SBC 461 heads

really only good for resto applications now, and some mild bracket motors. to prep for street is costly as compaired to better aftermarket units.
richie 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-23-2021, 11:41 AM   #4
Henrys Toy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 269
Likes: 3,723
Liked 520 Times in 176 Posts
Default Re: SBC 461 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by nhramnl View Post
Sadly, probably not a lot. I have a set also, complete with original valves, springs, retainers, etc. in literally perfect shape, with ZERO core shift, and a Corvette guy (327/250??) offered me $300 and acted like he was buying me a house. My experience doesn't establish the market, though (obviously). I was told a number of times that they aren't very important to drag racers anymore.
Some of the lower class circle burners can still use them.
It depends on the local Track and Rules.
If aftermarket Iron heads are legal, then they are really not as desirable as they once were. Maybe a Restorer would pick them up. Its a tough market right now.
Henrys Toy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2021, 08:26 AM   #5
Alan Nyhus
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
Default Re: SBC 461 heads

Still a viable casting for quite a few mid '60s 327's. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....."
Alan Nyhus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2021, 10:08 AM   #6
Don Sofranko
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Liked 128 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: SBC 461 heads

A friend of mine has several sets he is liquidating from his dads estate.
if anyone wants some 461 heads, I can hook you up, location near Ottumwa iowa.

Good read on the 461 heads and early vette heads
Copied from the vette forum not my words...

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ump-heads.html

The 461X heads are 61-63 ONLY. They ONLY came with 1.94/1.5 valves, and as mentioned, they had about 170cc intakes. PERIOD.
The 461 heads were 64-66 ONLY. They could have EITHER 1.94/1.5, or, 2.02/1.6 valves, depending on engine application (350, 365, 375hp/327). Also, as mentioned, they had about 160cc intakes. If the 461 heads were machined for the larger 2.02/1.6 valves, then the wall of the combustion chamber next to the intake valve was relieved by machining to reduce flow restriction. If they got the 1.94 valves, this extra machining was not done.
Below is one of my 461X heads which I had machined to accept 2.02/1.6 valves and the added machining for relief around the intake valve. The other head is an untouched head with 1.94/1.5 valves. Back in the day, and to some extent, still today, heads (either 461X or 461) which got the smaller valves are machined for the larger 2.02/1.6 valves and also have the extra machining done to improve flow around the intake valve. Of course, porting and polishing is also still done to these early heads. On mine, I only had the intake runners smoothed up to relieve the rough casting.

Debate on power pack, double hump heads, included talk on single and double hump heads. Per the website below, casting numbers are 3917290 and 3927185 for single hump.


Don

Last edited by Don Sofranko; 03-26-2021 at 10:25 AM.
Don Sofranko is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-26-2021, 10:54 AM   #7
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
Cool Re: SBC 461 heads

The 3917290 head at first glance resembles a Power Pack head, but the PP head has a pointed pyramid marking on the end. The 3917290 head has a rounded hump in the middle of the marking on the end. At first glance, they look the same, but the 290 head was a one year only head, 1968, for the 250 horse 327. It had rather large chambers and 1.72 intakes and 1.50 exhausts. The 250 horse 327 that year came only in Chevelles and the Impalas,Bel Airs and Biscaynes. Quite a few Super Stock GT combinations use them, but Stock is pretty limited to only those two body lines. The 68 250 horse 327 is not to be confused with the 62-65 engines, these had 4 jet carbs and the 896-520 power Pack heads, except that the 65 250 horse engine used the 461 castings. The 462 casting came on the 67-68 engines and could be used on the earlier motors, but the 461 can't be used on a '68 327 275 horse. That included a lot of Camaros,Novas Chevelles, Vettes, and the big cars, so the 462 casting is definitely more useful to class racers. It's identical to the 461 except for the casting number. The 69-70 041 head is a legal replacement for the 462, as is the 291 head going all the way back to a '62 327/300 horse engine.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2021, 12:03 PM   #8
Tim H
VIP Member
 
Tim H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1,068
Liked 481 Times in 158 Posts
Default Re: SBC 461 heads

The 462 and 461 combustion chambers are NOT identical. 461 heads have a rather unique combustion chamber shape as compared to all the other 1960's - '70's era hi-perf SBC heads.

Last edited by Tim H; 03-26-2021 at 05:55 PM.
Tim H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2021, 06:15 PM   #9
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
Cool Re: SBC 461 heads

Alright, I have a 3782461 head that someone told me was a 461X casting. I don't see an X on it anywhere near the casting numbers, I remembered seeing 461X heads that had the X at the end of the casting number. This head has a date code of G 111, but it does have a small X on the bottom of the head right below the water passage near the deck surface and between the intake gasket surface at the water crossover passage. It has 1.940 intakes, 1.500 exhausts, and looks like an original old head that might never have been apart. Where was the X that designated this as a 461X casting?
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2021, 07:27 PM   #10
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
Cool Re: SBC 461 heads

Seems like the 461 head is only legal up to about 1966 cars, the 462 head is legal from '61 to 68, the 041 head is legal from '61 to '70, since most new stocker projects are newer than that, the 041 head from '69-70 would be a better head to get, since it has a far broader range of applications. It's like the 993 casting for the '70's cars. Legal replacement for a lot of cars, for sure.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.