|
![]() |
#1 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 456
Liked 16,521 Times in 1,521 Posts
|
![]()
You guys running Super Stock GT may want to read the updated rule changes. Not sure how big of a deal it is as I don't run the class, but it may be for you guys.
Super Stock GT Rules |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 712
Liked 1,572 Times in 580 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
"RWD must retain complete stock front-suspension system as produced by manufacturer for body used". The use of an NHRA accepted front suspension has been deleted. A few times I requested the allowance of aftermarket Chrome Moly cradle/crossmembers for RWD cars such as Camaros and Mustangs, making easy to use a big oil pan and servicing. Even Bruce Bachelder complemented my proposal that included pictures, drawings and comparisons between FWD converted cars and RWD cars and he did not see a problem, only to get a call from Bruce that it had been shot down by two people in Glendora. Also notice a big change to the weight break calculations and the addition of two new classes: FGT/AA and FGT/BB. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 700
Likes: 446
Liked 170 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
If I am reading this correctly, one of the changes is that the shipping weight of the vehicle used no longer matters in GT? You can get any car as light or heavy (within ballast rules) as you want to run GT?
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 712
Liked 1,572 Times in 580 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 280
Liked 959 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
Does it look like a Gt car can be a 4dr now?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
If only they allowed 4 cylinders in GT also....lol
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 12-05-2020 at 12:47 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 683
Likes: 80
Liked 800 Times in 244 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 2,367
Liked 3,165 Times in 969 Posts
|
![]()
Makes my head hurt, hopefully Dwight will work his magic so I can explore some other possibilities....sympathy to those who are taking a big hit to gain nothing
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 712
Liked 1,572 Times in 580 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Since the Ford Pinto was available with a V-6, how about a Pinto with the CJ Windsor 352 or 428 engine in GT class? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 683
Likes: 80
Liked 800 Times in 244 Posts
|
![]()
I know you're joking but header fit would be a nightmare, you would need at least a 1 3/4 / 1 7/8 step and there isn't even room for a 1 5/8. I think I'll stick with the 4 cylinder stuff.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|