No HP on the Sorenson combo?

George Fitzpatrick · 05-07-2009, 08:15 AM

Not wanting to antagonize anyone especially my Chevy friends, but why is there no HP on the Sorenson combo? Can anyone shed some light? From what I have read he went 1.40 under @sea level correction. Soooooo then according to the AHFS rules it’s automatic 3.25% just like the Ebody HEMI’S got, or am I missing something?

junior barns · 05-07-2009, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick

Not wanting to antagonize anyone especially my Chevy friends, but why is there no HP on the Sorenson combo? Can anyone shed some light? From what I have read he went 1.40 under @sea level correction. Soooooo then according to the AHFS rules it’s automatic 3.25% just like the Ebody HEMI’S got, or am I missing something?

run did not count! did not pass weight!

I guess????

would like to know for sure myself??

Jeff Teuton · 05-07-2009, 09:54 AM

Fred Henson didn't pass weight when he got HP'ed at No Problem for going 1.40 under. He didn't even go over the scales. But Monday there was the feared 3.25% added to the 426 Hemi, but then it ain't a Chevy and it ain't Div 4. I see this as a problem issue. I'm also not sure if Bob Dennis went over the scales every time he gets hit. He has large experience in this field.

bsa633 · 05-07-2009, 10:13 AM

1 633 B/SA Hal Sorensen, Vancouver WA, '69 Camaro 10.159 11.93 -1.771
2 6471 K/SA Bill Edgeworth, Tacoma WA, '77 Firebird 11.658 13.38 -1.722
3 636 H/SA John Hill, Fairbanks AK, '86 Camaro 11.379 12.86 -1.481
4 7592 C/SA Richie Pauley, Newhall CA, '68 Mustang 10.615 12.09 -1.475
5 7980 F/SA Steve Wann, Modesto CA, '73 Dart 11.078 12.55 -1.472
6 6300 C/SA Glenn Person, Regina SK, '70 Challenger 10.624 12.09 -1.466
7 6149 B/SA Wesley Libby, Mead WA, '71 Challenger 10.472 11.93 -1.458
They were 3 tenths faster than other cars going for and getting records including one of the fastest B cars...that is one bad ride for sure...but something is still wrong in this picture..

OLD GUY · 05-07-2009, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick

Not wanting to antagonize anyone especially my Chevy friends, but why is there no HP on the Sorenson combo? Can anyone shed some light? From what I have read he went 1.40 under @sea level correction. Soooooo then according to the AHFS rules it’s automatic 3.25% just like the Ebody HEMI’S got, or am I missing something?

I believe the answer is Glendora suddenly has cold feet. If that was you or Steve Wann you would have had HP before you got back to the trailer. I guess the rules don't apply to Chevy guys. Bruce doesn't return phone calls on this issue either

Jack Matyas · 05-07-2009, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD GUY

I believe the answer is Glendora suddenly has cold feet. If that was you or Steve Wann you would have had HP before you got back to the trailer. I guess the rules don't apply to Chevy guys. Bruce doesn't return phone calls on this issue either

Dave -- Believe me I know firsthand the rules do apply to Chevy's -- a couple of years ago I hit the magic 1.40 mark by accident when the air got great at Atco and on Monday morning our LT1 Camaro got the 3.25% gift ............

junior barns · 05-07-2009, 11:53 AM

: No HP on the Sorenson combo?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fred Henson didn't pass weight when he got HP'ed at No Problem for going 1.40 under. He didn't even go over the scales. But Monday there was the feared 3.25% added to the 426 Hemi, but then it ain't a Chevy and it ain't Div 4. I see this as a problem issue. I'm also not sure if Bob Dennis went over the scales every time he gets hit. He has large experience in this field.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK

Thats the point Jeff. Fred never went across the scale. The camaro did and failed!! Run disqualified!!

George Fitzpatrick · 05-07-2009, 12:24 PM

So according to the rule book p48 (weighing of vehicle/fuel check) Fred Henson should have been disqualified from the event. And the run should not have counted. Unless I’m reading it wrong.

John Kelley · 05-07-2009, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick

So according to the rule book p48 (weighing of vehicle/fuel check) Fred Henson should have been disqualified from the event. And the run should not have counted. Unless I’m reading it wrong.

Perhaps at the race at Belle Rose being a first round loser he was waved past the scales.I've seen that a lot...

M Brand 505B · 05-07-2009, 12:48 PM

Why have a rule if the people who made the rule do not enforce it evenly?

05-07-2009, 08:15 AM	#1
George Fitzpatrick Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Babylon, NY Posts: 344 Likes: 118 Liked 94 Times in 24 Posts	No HP on the Sorenson combo? Not wanting to antagonize anyone especially my Chevy friends, but why is there no HP on the Sorenson combo? Can anyone shed some light? From what I have read he went 1.40 under @sea level correction. Soooooo then according to the AHFS rules it’s automatic 3.25% just like the Ebody HEMI’S got, or am I missing something? __________________ George Fitzpatrick 426 HEMI STK, SS

05-07-2009, 09:54 AM	#3
Jeff Teuton VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houma, LA Posts: 2,717 Likes: 2 Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts	Re: No HP on the Sorenson combo? Fred Henson didn't pass weight when he got HP'ed at No Problem for going 1.40 under. He didn't even go over the scales. But Monday there was the feared 3.25% added to the 426 Hemi, but then it ain't a Chevy and it ain't Div 4. I see this as a problem issue. I'm also not sure if Bob Dennis went over the scales every time he gets hit. He has large experience in this field. __________________ Jeff Teuton 4022 STK

05-07-2009, 10:13 AM	#4
bsa633 Banned Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 310 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: No HP on the Sorenson combo? 1 633 B/SA Hal Sorensen, Vancouver WA, '69 Camaro 10.159 11.93 -1.771 2 6471 K/SA Bill Edgeworth, Tacoma WA, '77 Firebird 11.658 13.38 -1.722 3 636 H/SA John Hill, Fairbanks AK, '86 Camaro 11.379 12.86 -1.481 4 7592 C/SA Richie Pauley, Newhall CA, '68 Mustang 10.615 12.09 -1.475 5 7980 F/SA Steve Wann, Modesto CA, '73 Dart 11.078 12.55 -1.472 6 6300 C/SA Glenn Person, Regina SK, '70 Challenger 10.624 12.09 -1.466 7 6149 B/SA Wesley Libby, Mead WA, '71 Challenger 10.472 11.93 -1.458 They were 3 tenths faster than other cars going for and getting records including one of the fastest B cars...that is one bad ride for sure...but something is still wrong in this picture..

05-07-2009, 11:53 AM	#7
junior barns Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 541 Likes: 11 Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts	Re: No HP on the Sorenson combo? : No HP on the Sorenson combo? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fred Henson didn't pass weight when he got HP'ed at No Problem for going 1.40 under. He didn't even go over the scales. But Monday there was the feared 3.25% added to the 426 Hemi, but then it ain't a Chevy and it ain't Div 4. I see this as a problem issue. I'm also not sure if Bob Dennis went over the scales every time he gets hit. He has large experience in this field. __________________ Jeff Teuton 4022 STK Thats the point Jeff. Fred never went across the scale. The camaro did and failed!! Run disqualified!!

05-07-2009, 12:24 PM	#8
George Fitzpatrick Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Babylon, NY Posts: 344 Likes: 118 Liked 94 Times in 24 Posts	Re: No HP on the Sorenson combo? So according to the rule book p48 (weighing of vehicle/fuel check) Fred Henson should have been disqualified from the event. And the run should not have counted. Unless I’m reading it wrong. __________________ George Fitzpatrick 426 HEMI STK, SS

05-07-2009, 12:48 PM	#10
M Brand 505B Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Georgia Posts: 158 Likes: 2 Liked 31 Times in 10 Posts	Re: No HP on the Sorenson combo? Why have a rule if the people who made the rule do not enforce it evenly? __________________ Michael Brand II 505B - F/SA