X /Stock ?

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by Chuck Weissberg

but Billy, YOU are the "slow" class WIZARD

I'm a hack, ask anybody.

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by Chuck Weissberg

I believe Billty Nees said the mains cannot hold up on the iron duke 4

Nope, it wasn't me. But someone on here did say something like that. After thrashing (trashing?) 301 Pontiacs for a few years, I wouldn't be concerned about the bottom ends in the iron dukes. Believe it or not, they use a lot of the same parts.
85 Camaro/Tech4 has been on my to-do list for a while. It's better than the earlier ones.

[Chuck Weissberg]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

26 lbs. per.
RWD V8, 6, or 4
Stick or auto..100# extra for stick
Around 17.00 index.
Who would support it?
Who would build one?
Who just fell asleep reading this?

I'd bet dollars to doughnuts YOU and Billy Nees would come up with some GREAT combinatins

[goinbroke2]

1979 3 seat ford country squire wagon with 302 2 bbl.
3703# and 130hp = 28.48 natural

1979 wagon
3643# and 130hp = 28.02 natural

1979 2dr ltd
3406# and 130hp =26.2 natural

There are LOTS of ford combos with the 302 2bbl!! Yes I would love to see a 26# v8 class!!

[goinbroke2]

So.....it was all good until I mentioned the 302's??? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by goinbroke2

There are LOTS of ford combos with the 302 2bbl!! Yes I would love to see a 26# v8 class!!

And so would I but (IMHO) NHRA doesn't like slow, in-expensive combos that the average working slob can afffford. Before they come up with a 26 lb. V8 class, they should try "fixing" the weight breaks in their FWD classes.

[FED 387]

I might of been the one on the Iron Dukes 4---we did a lot of coordinated development with Paul Vanderley & Harold at General Kinetics and also Pontiac racing on creating SD4 parts and not only making them perform but also to survive and not self destruct---FED 387

[Billy Nees]

I wouldn't think that the bottom end would be much of an issue in a Stocker.