Thread: 65-85 under.
View Single Post
Old 12-24-2022, 04:14 PM   #59
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 3,093
Liked 6,784 Times in 1,522 Posts
Default Re: 65-85 under.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I do understand that there are lower classes, below G, and below where I like to run. Race cars should go pretty fast, at least for me, or they're just not really fun. If it won't run the quarter at least as well as my Harley Pro street Breakout, it just doesn't do it for me. I realize that ain't where everyone is in the sport. Some people really enjoy 13, 14, 15, and 16 second cars. That's their choice. And hey, maybe their indexes don't need adjustment, or much adjustment.
Alan, your last 2 posts are "wise words from a wise man".
The only way that I could even consider an index reduction would be if it DIDN'T include the lower classes. You would have to agree that the "less than hi-performance" combos largely don't respond to or aren't included in many of the "enhancements" that have been given out over the years. Would you consider this for a minute? The L/SA index has been "screwy" (for lack of a better term) forever. Look it up. How about A thru K get -.10 (including the FS classes) and L down (including the FWD classes) get left as is? Or if A/K get -.20 and L down -.10? Would that be enough to keep the fast boys happy?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

World's greatest Under-Achiever!

Last edited by Billy Nees; 12-24-2022 at 04:16 PM.
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote