Re: True meaning
I thought all you winers (not just you Dick) were complaining how you didn't want "sandbagging" or 1000 ft. racing!! Now you have a rule where you get rewarded for being one of the 128 fastest cars......not a .5 second under class winner.....and you are against it??? Which side are you on?
To be a class winner, your car should be fast! With today's indexes and low horsepower ratings.......as most of you have been stating on here for the past 2 years or so......a class winner should be able to qualify in the top 128! Indy is the only race where this usually comes into play......so I guess if you don't have a capable car you should speed it up or stay home......that is if you want to complain about it!!! Or, if you are a true "performanced based racer" you should go to Indy, let 'er rip and hope for the best! Isn't that what you were all crying for??? Now you got it and your crying!
I'm sure you'll have some great class racing as always at Indy, and the fastest car won't always win class. But I'm sure those cars that have a fighting chance will qualify!
I'll agree with one thing Dick said......class wins need to be rewarded......like they used to! I remember when you could win $2000 or so, now it's $800, if you're lucky, or unless you own a brand new car.
Good luck to all!
Last edited by Bryan Worner; 07-23-2008 at 03:08 PM.
|