04-30-2022, 07:33 PM
|
#50
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
Re: Lets talk NHRA Stk/SS with Lonnie Grim - Ideas - Comment
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil
64 cars times $340. entry fee equals $21760. Surely they could bump up the pitiful round money and finalist payout without digging even deeper into the "customers" pockets. If they can`t sharpen their pencils enough to find where all the remaining entry money disappeared to, open up the quotas.
As mentioned, if you want to run solid roller lifters in an engine that left the factory with a hydraulic flat tappet cam, add a second "S" to the class designation on the windows.
As for "getting rid of all the outdated slow cars that nobody but old people can relate to", you mean eliminate the very cars that Stock and Super Stock were based upon? Like cars that were available new to the general public, with a production VIN number, and the same engines, transmissions and rearends as those cars that anybody to drive of the lot? Also, when I look at the typical Stock -S/S racer in the pits, I have to say, the vast majority are "old enough" to relate to traditional Class cars. I can certainly relate more to a 69 Mustang with a 428 Cobra Jet , like I used to drive to work, or my old neighbors SS396 Chevelle, that a 2022 "modern race car", that can basically race in Stock with a Competition Eliminator engine, a 2 speed automatic, and a solid 9" Ford rearend!
|
With all the changes nhra has made i dont know why they would not allow rollers if you can run flat tappets then run them. I dont think theres a big hp gain with rollers.
|
|
|