Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6
Correct, they do not need to be exact duplicates, however, they must maintain the specifications I mentioned in my previous post.
It appears that some engine builders may have some close friends in piston companies because I have taken apart engines that although they have the approved part number stamped,they do not meet the approved spec sheet.
I have found the following discrepancies in some of the Stock Eliminator engines I have torn apart:
- Ring grooves that are thinner than spec.
- Shorter distance from top of piston to top ring land that shown in spec.
- Deeper valve reliefs than spec.
- Smaller domes than spec.
- Smaller dish volumes than spec.
During a teardown, does NHRA assume the piston was built and approved in that configuration or the engine owner blames the piston company?
I assume since there are less intrusive teardowns and less piston removals, that many are taking the risk by doing so.
|
To quote Wesley Roberson, "it is the racers responsibility"... in NHRA D4 if you are torn down you will be held accountable no matter where it came from or how long you've had it if it does not match the spec's on the blueprint sheets for your combo and this applies to anything on the car/truck. there is some tolerance but only if it is not to your advantage. for example if you are supposed to have a 11cc dome and it measures less you will be given a pass unless it is way off however if it checks over by POINT ANYTHING you will be DQ'd along with other actions by Glendora depending on the nature of the infraction.. for combustion chamber volume you can be over but never under because it is an advantage for you. something that the old guys know but most newbies don't, if a valve contacts a piston and leaves a mark on it, you'll get tossed for it if torn down.
Jackie