Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Pearson
You could no be more wrong in this post. The aftermarket parts have made the engines more durable. The cost of the new parts is more expensive than the old junk yard stuff of years ago. The engines did not last like the ones we have today. I would not want to go back to running a production block even if you could find a decent one. I still run 50 year old head castings on my car right now because that is what I have but I would not spend the money to build a new set from old castings. The times have changed but racing stock and super stock are still fun and alive and well.
|
Mike, it isn't about being right or wrong, though. I haven't broken a rod, crank, or lifter in years. I'll absolutely grant you that aftermarket stuff is a thousand times better than the OEM stuff. That's not the point. WHAT MAKES A SUPER STOCK CAR A SUPER STOCK CAR? We're at the point where the only thing you
can't use is an aftermarket head casting. Let's face facts; NHRA has completely failed to enforce
any meaningful rules in Super Stock, so we
are going to get to the point where a 283/220 is only a 283/220 because it has a 4GC on top of it and runners that pour prescribed volumes and flat-top pistons of a certain bore diameter and a crank of a certain stroke. How is that NOT simply a
version of a comp engine? I understand that it's way too late to do anything about it (there's no stopping "progress"), but I still think (as I always have) that Stock and Super Stock racing are continuing down the rabbit hole of ridiculous costs and endless rationalization, which just keeps driving people away.