Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK
I was thinking the 96 Mustang 4.6 combo was more favorable that the 91-95 combos
|
Oh most definitely. The one rub is the cracking intake I mentioned. I think also look at it from the respect of when they fit the same class with the same engine, hence the same weight, punching the smaller hole in the air has to be beneficial. Plus that Mustang bodystyle has so many more engine combinations if a change is ever desired.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone
Easy enough to figure this one out.
I'd like to extend an invitation to this fellow to bring that thing to the US Nationals.
There will be a fella there named Travis Miller..Long time Ford man. He'd love to check that car out.
|
That guy's own words in recent months on a Tbird/Cougar forum:
"it has a big cam, big intake, big compression, big heads and big cubes"
"TFS intake, TFS heads, 90mm maf, 3.5" intake tube, 75 mm throttle body (too small), Bullet custom cams, 12.5/1 comp ratio,
big bore/stroker 5.3 Liter, Eagle crank, eagle rods, SHM 1 7/8"-3" long tubes, 4500 stall converter, 4:56 gears. E-85 for fuel."