Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee
So Holier than Thou Billy Nees would knowingly build a bogus combination? Really! Then I find it quite hypocritical you would arrange a meeting with NHRA about AMC parts you perceive as "bogus." Why would you not have marched into NHRA proving the Olds 260 4bbl was "bogus?" Because obviously it served your needs. I'd always heard (from numerous sources) it was you that got the Olds 260 4bbl removed from the books. Now I 'm hearing different. Hmm interesting..
A previous post you said the 283 - 327 intake needed to be "corrected". What progress have you made with NHRA on the removal of that "bogus" part?
What parts are next in your catalog?
|
Holier than Thou huh? I'm thinkin' no! But I wasn't blowing smoke rings up anybodys a** to get it put in the guide either. I can take somebody like you calling me a hypocrite, no problem. If you talked to Mr. Lang about that deal, I'm pretty sure that you would find that I'm the one that finally got it removed. NHRA knows very well how I feel about the 327 intake on a 283 deal. That's not over yet. My next bogus part? Getting the TRW race piston specs removed from the 70 AMC 390 and getting the right piston specs put back in!