Quote:
Originally Posted by SStockDart
If you can tell me what is fair or equitable about a rule that treats different compititors, differently, please do
Rhetorical question as you stated it. The rules do treat competitors equitably. Each have the opportunity to cut a good light and run the dial. The one with the best light and closer to the dial wins 100% of the time.
The first red light rule treats the first-to-leave cars differently from the way it treats second-to-leave cars, if the first-to-leave red light.
So you believe the slower cars deserve a "mulligan"?
|
This rule does NOTHING for the slower car beyond offering as way to give it an EQUAL chance to compare red lights with the faster car.
Two cars; two chances. Where's the "gimmee"????
To award a win to one car for an infraction he never had a chance to commit, IS a "gimmee."
We don't need "gimmee's" in Class racing... or, Bracket racing.
Let's get rid of it.