View Single Post
Old 01-30-2010, 05:20 PM   #2
Chris "drooze" Wertman
VIP Member
 
Chris "drooze" Wertman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 09 Challenger/Mustang engines

No Im sure its not , its also 25 k more.....but what Im saying is with Bosch price is meaningless, they are expesive period like for a simple Rolex system which isnt rocket science, and CERTAINLY not worth 20k.

The point, my point, maybe I wasnt clear and its my fault.

In 1 to 2 years the DI VVT 6 will be capable of outrunning nearly every small displacment 8 out there. IF people develop the engine potential properly.

That was the point, the Camaro 6 has YEARS of potential, its all R&D, when they throw HP at it, so what there are 32 other things to find it on with a system like that ONLY concentrating on the Cam and Fuel alone.

Phasing the cams can be done already with the ECU were using, so that becomes moot, the DI can be done, like I said BOTH at the same time havent but thats because noone has tried, not that its not capable.

Mark my words the 3.6 Camaro will make a killer Stock Eliminator car, with years of potential, UNLESS the NHRA sets phasing specs, they havent so far, but it COULD happen.

This is a whole new animal to them.....to a large extent, how the rules are changed to reflect it will be interesting.

And the other point was GM has dropped the ball with as much potential as the Camaros DO have, and Im a Dodge Guy, I wouldnt mind putting my hands on a Camaro 3.6......

What you seem to be saying, and please correct me if Im wrong, is contrary to what Im saying, hence you are saying the Camaro 3.6 has no great potential, and that you think DI and VVT phasing isnt really going to gain much. (aside from the fact I can run 12:1 on 86 octane with a DI system)

????

Like I said, I think it has the potential......you seem to think its too hard and not doable ? Well......like Eisntein said "Wether you think you can or not, youre right"

So I guess were both right

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueOval Ralph View Post
The Bosch for DI in ALMS as used is not the same as the as the Bosch 4.0 as used in the Rolex Series 4.0 is a spec ecu, as is the engine wiring harness. As for ti handling the phaser if it is a Enna phacer it needs a Enna drive controller and wiring harness.
Chris "drooze" Wertman is offline   Reply With Quote