[bill dedman]

Art Leong asked, "Why is everyone so hung up on MPH. It's an elapsed time race not a high mph race."

That's true.
But, for purposes of engine output analysis, the e.t's can vary a lot depending on traction; mphs do not. That makes the mph figure a lot more reliable indicator of horsepower delivered to the ground.

You can make a run taking off in 2nd gear and it will absolutely KILL yout e.t., but won't affect the mph nearly as much.

These Mustangs are set up to leave very "soft" and for the mph they're turning, really should be running a lot quicker than they are... like 9.40's-9.50's. I'll bet their 60-foot times are nowhere near the 1.20s, where they should be.

But, the mph remains the reliable indicator of performance that tells HP output without much variance.

That's why people on here, who are trying to evaluate the output of these CJ engines, are "hung up" on trap speed. It's just the most accurate way to judge the potential of these cars.