Tech question--
 

If I took my '70 Monte Carlo and wanted to race it in Stock, would it be against the rule book to remove the front disc brakes on it and replace them with from drums from a Chevelle? I think the discs were standard equipment back then on the MC, but the Chevelle still had standard front drums until 1972.

Re: Tech question--
 

i would give tech a call, but i can not see a reason why you could not.

Re: Tech question--
 

Rulebook says "Must be equipped with stock production four-wheel hydraulic
brake system, or aftermarket disc brakes"

Sounds like to the letter of the rule, if you remove the OE brakes, you must install aftermarket discs.

The next obvious question would be, why?

Re: Tech question--
 

Greg, I don't know your reason for wanting to switch your disc. to drums, but if it is to get rid of some weight be careful. Many years ago I had a 69 Chevy 2 with factory disc. on the front & was told I could get rid of 40 lbs. going to the drums. Had a friend with a Camaro with front drums, we made a trade I even did all of the work, well the only thing that I lost was time & alot of braking power. I weighed the parts as I was making the switch, the weight difference was nothing, but a deal is a deal & he was a happy camper. My car ran low 10's 130 mph. & it was hard to stop after that switch. Danny

Re: Tech question--
 

Should be a bit lighter, from my experience..
Also ,less drag
Plus, it's easier to heat and bend the drum brake steering arms for toe-in issues.
Greg, Just do it..Nobody cares (except for maybe a few keyboard racers)

Re: Tech question--
 

One thing about this whole deal, the discs were all power assist with the big round booster on the fitrwall. Drums either came power or manual. Running a vacuum booster with any kind of performance camshaft would absolutely not work,especially a Stock Eliminator type cam. That would be a weight saver as well.

Re: Tech question--
 

Prior to NHRA allowing lightweight, aftermarket disc brakes, many racers s swapped out the factory disc brakes for manual drums. As Mark said, less weight, and could be adjusted for zero drag. Funny, how, when many of the fast, higher classed cars, that had replaced the factory discs, for drums (and often to very light, small, 6 cylinder drum brakes), started lobbying for "Better" (read that as even lighter) aftermarket brakes, it became all about safety. Kinda like when lightweight racing seats were requested , again for "Safety". Have to wonder how many racers would have installed the aftermarket seats if they had to be the same weight as the seats being replaced, or heavier. I would guess "safety" would not have be as much of a concern in that case! As for the drum brakes, my buddys SS/F 66 Chevelle ran 9.7s at 138 MPH, on the stock 9 1/2" drum brakes, and another buddys 67 Mustang bracket car ran the same numbers with the original 10" drums. Neither had stopping issues, despite both being stick cars that went into neutral at the finish line, so no engine braking. Of course that also depends on the shut down length of the tracks being raced on. Cold drum brakes also often hold the car in the burnout box better than some manual disc brakes as well.

Re: Tech question--
 

My dads 68 chevelle c/s 3680 pound car had drum brakes on it .at phoenix he could barely get it stopped at the turn off we had to put new shoes on it every race because they would get cracks in the pads on the shoe.go with disc brakes stock or after market. much safer .unstead of push and pray you stop.

Re: Tech question--
 

My ex-modified eliminator camaro has drum brakes up front. With times of high 9's to low 10's and speeds of 130s it was a bear to stop.

Re: Tech question--
 

If you go from power to manual brakes, remember to include a retainer so the pushrod cannot fall out of the master cylinder cup.