Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
|
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
Quote:
|
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
Maybe they should institute NASCAR like fines, $200,000 fine for 0.17 cubic inches???
"Long was fined a record $200,000 in May 2009 for having an engine that was 0.17 cubic inches over the regulation size during practice for the Sprint Showdown at Charlotte Motor Speedway." http://www.sportingnews.com/nascar/n...-hamlin-appeal |
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
Something precipitated this, anybody know?
It's a small pool |
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
That should get a year off minimum.
|
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
Remember when the most eyebrow-raising phrase would've just been "Whipple supercharger rotors used in the Stock and Super Stock..."? :rolleyes:
|
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
Quote:
Good question. was this a shootout car or regular eliminator car?? Another reason for more consistent tech during events. |
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
It's been going on since Indy 2016 there is a $8000 version out there now the best version next was to be $20,000 before NHRA finally step in. All this from a Very good source!
Quote:
|
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
IF someone was doing this, it will be very interesting to see the field qualifing numbers, as once you step over the line, duplicating performance becomes a real problem (remember all the stories from Wayne County to cover up?)
Pass the popcorn, this could get good Interestingly a finger pointing post has been deleted! |
Re: Bogus superchargers?? Naughty, naughty!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.