2009 NHRA Rules
I received my rulebook yesterday and noticed under the cylinder head paragraph that it now states "any valve job permitted" without the 1/4" below valve seat cut being mentioned. Is this a typo error ? Does anybody have input on this. How about it Travis Miller,can you give us some guidance on this ?
|
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
Quote:
Travis (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.) |
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
I don't know!!! My 2009 Rulebook states on page 104 under CYLINDER HEADS, "Cylinder heads are additionally restricted in that they must retain original-size valves at original angles +/- 1 degree and must be able to hold original head volume per NHRA Specifications." That kinda contradicts their "any valve job accepted" statement on the bottom of the section doesn't it?
In Superstock on page 114 under CYLINDER HEADS, it says, "Valves must retain stock angle; valve-stem angle, +/- 1 degee." Again, toward the bottom of the section, "Any valve job accepted". I'm mystified? All this stuff was supposedly superceded by NHRA in prior year revisions; the wording under CYLINDER HEADS in both Stock and SS is different in the 2009 rules compared to those of 2008, yet when they revised the CYLINDER HEAD section, they failed to remove the contradictions of their own revisons when writing the 2009 Rulebook. Who proof-reads this s--t? Or doesn't "ANY" really mean "ANY" with respect to original valve/seat angles? Jerry |
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
Jerry, that angle referenced would be the actual valve to deck angle,
I.E.> 23 degree SBC valves must stay within + or - 1 degree, so no relocating the guides or angle milling to roll the valve angle. The wording would indicate that you cannot alter the area beyond the valve seats, which can now be replaced. ???? The spec used to require that that original valve / seat angles and restricted how many angles you could put on the valves / seats, and the width of the margins and the seat angles. |
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
Dave,
It may be what you think, but the average guy is thinking of valve jobs as valve jobs. Also, the paragraph regarding Superstock references both STOCK ANGLE, and the +/- 1 degree (my second paragraph - quote on page 114), so I believe you're interpretation is incorrect. Yes the valve angle/deck surface relationship will change with angle-milling and NHRA is aware of that, but then they wouldn't need to include "STOCK ANGLE" in that paragraph. It's still a contradiction. Jerry |
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
You can't angle mill a head enough to change the valve angle more than a degree or should I say, you can but the head wouldn't be useable... what they don't want you doin is reboreing the guides to change the angle
|
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
Quote:
The "for acceptable valve job, see General Regulations 1:2 illustration" was also removed as part of last January's rules revisions. HOWEVER, the 2008 Rules Revisions have already been removed from the NHRA website, as the 2009 Rules Revisions are up. |
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
Quote:
|
Re: 2009 NHRA Rules
Bub, you are right on again,,,,,,,i vote for you as Tech Director!!!!!! lol
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.