CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Super CJ (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=28332)

Jared Jordan 09-10-2010 01:59 PM

Super CJ
 
1 5333 SS/AA Randy Hopkins, Scandia MN, '10 Mustang 8.473 9.70 -1.227


Wow. Only .3 better than the next qualifier and .25 better than any SS/AA car has ever gone (factored #'s excluded).

Underrated? Naaaah.

Johnny U 09-10-2010 02:13 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Gotta love them Fords. I wonder if I can get an "A" plan or some other plan on one of those cars from work. I could put a trailer hitch on my Buick and use that as a tow vehicle.

Bob Pagano 09-10-2010 04:33 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
So, Fezell just went 39 at E-town. # 1. Whats new ? Change that, now 9.37
Now here is a car I can respect,
2 1134 B/SA Tom Kreeber, Rensselaer NY, '62 Fury 10.139 11.25 -1.111

CFM 09-10-2010 04:36 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Pagano (Post 209541)
So, Fezell just went 39 at E-town. # 1. Whats new ? Change that, now 9.37

Did he pull the chute?

X-TECH MAN 09-10-2010 05:32 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Jordan (Post 209528)
1 5333 SS/AA Randy Hopkins, Scandia MN, '10 Mustang 8.473 9.70 -1.227


Wow. Only .3 better than the next qualifier and .25 better than any SS/AA car has ever gone (factored #'s excluded).

Underrated? Naaaah.

I guess C.W. is glad that the Mustangs dont get to run his class.

Chad Rhodes 09-10-2010 06:23 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Jordan (Post 209528)
1 5333 SS/AA Randy Hopkins, Scandia MN, '10 Mustang 8.473 9.70 -1.227


Wow. Only .3 better than the next qualifier and .25 better than any SS/AA car has ever gone (factored #'s excluded).

Underrated? Naaaah.

its official, the Hemi cars aren't king anymore.................................add some more people with VERY expensive race cars to the PISSED OFF list, but at least they don't have to run them heads up.

BlueOval Ralph 09-10-2010 07:34 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
The question of the day is does the SS/AA have the correct cage?????????



Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 209550)
its official, the Hemi cars aren't king anymore.................................add some more people with VERY expensive race cars to the PISSED OFF list, but at least they don't have to run them heads up.


SPS 09-10-2010 07:34 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
8.47 eh!
Got to have a SFI 25-5 cage for quicker than 8.50.

Ask Bo Butner....got a year off for that.

FJ

T Ketels 09-10-2010 08:24 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
With nearly a 20 mph headwind as well - just wait until tomorrow morning to really see what it will run. From what I remember, it looked like an 8.50 cage and not a 25.5.

Tim

Bruce Noland 09-10-2010 09:59 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Jason Fuller's post was removed because it was obscene. Enough said!

lstanford 09-10-2010 10:00 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueOval Ralph (Post 209566)
The question of the day is does the SS/AA have the correct cage?????????

If your that worried about the cage, why don't you check it out personally. You seem to be an expert on everything else.

Ed Fernandez 09-10-2010 10:08 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 209610)
Jason Fuller's post was removed because it was obscene. Enough said!

Thank you Bruce.

Mack Reeves 09-11-2010 04:47 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 209610)
Jason Fuller's post was removed because it was obscene. Enough said!



My thanks also......

astikhossw 09-11-2010 08:50 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
So that little engine is making like 900 plus horsepower.

Superfan1 09-11-2010 09:48 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by astikhossw (Post 209660)
So that little engine is making like 900 plus horsepower.

It is probably closer to a 1000HP. The classification guide lists the coupe at 500HP with a shipping weight of 3220 lbs which gives it a factor of 6.44 making it a natural SS/A or SS/AA car (6.00 - 6.49). In order to run at the class minimum, 220 lbs would have to be removed from the car. Assuming that it was possible to do so, Hopkins would be at the same weight (3000 lbs) as the SS/AH cars. His ETs and speeds are pretty much equal to what a Westcott or Barton powered SS/AH will run, and I am pretty sure that they are right around 1000HP.

Jared Jordan 09-11-2010 11:46 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
The CJ in SS/AA trim has to weigh the same as a 4-speed SS/AH (3170) and is 40 lbs lighter than the automatic SS/AH (3210). In SS/BA the CJ weighs 3420, or the same as the Hemi B-Bodies.

The scary thing is that we still don't know how fast those cars can really be. Yeah, we've all got a pretty good idea, but what happens when one of those cars is back-halved and they can really lean on them in the first 100 feet of the racetrack? I have no idea what the 1st gear ratio is in those C2 transmissions, but all those cars look pretty lazy leaving the starting line in comparison to, say, Armstrong's Vette or Percy's Savoy.

One more thing: you think they've got the throttle blade all the way open? I don't...

BlueOval Ralph 09-11-2010 11:46 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
Will Jamie and Jesse issue a recal and update the 2010 or the 2008?


Quote:

Originally Posted by T Ketels (Post 209581)
With nearly a 20 mph headwind as well - just wait until tomorrow morning to really see what it will run. From what I remember, it looked like an 8.50 cage and not a 25.5.

Tim


BlueOval Ralph 09-11-2010 12:01 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Don't you mean got the throttle blade's all the way open?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Jordan (Post 209705)
The CJ in SS/AA trim has to weigh the same as a 4-speed SS/AH (3170) and is 40 lbs lighter than the automatic SS/AH (3210). In SS/BA the CJ weighs 3420, or the same as the Hemi B-Bodies.

The scary thing is that we still don't know how fast those cars can really be. Yeah, we've all got a pretty good idea, but what happens when one of those cars is back-halved and they can really lean on them in the first 100 feet of the racetrack? I have no idea what the 1st gear ratio is in those C2 transmissions, but all those cars look pretty lazy leaving the starting line in comparison to, say, Armstrong's Vette or Percy's Savoy.

One more thing: you think they've got the throttle blade all the way open? I don't...


Superfan1 09-11-2010 02:12 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Jordan (Post 209705)
The CJ in SS/AA trim has to weigh the same as a 4-speed SS/AH (3170) and is 40 lbs lighter than the automatic SS/AH (3210). In SS/BA the CJ weighs 3420, or the same as the Hemi B-Bodies.

The scary thing is that we still don't know how fast those cars can really be. Yeah, we've all got a pretty good idea, but what happens when one of those cars is back-halved and they can really lean on them in the first 100 feet of the racetrack? I have no idea what the 1st gear ratio is in those C2 transmissions, but all those cars look pretty lazy leaving the starting line in comparison to, say, Armstrong's Vette or Percy's Savoy.

One more thing: you think they've got the throttle blade all the way open? I don't...

I didn't add in the 170 lbs. for the driver (3170), so our math is basically the same. I have heard that they run the throttle blades only 56% open. Wow!!

Tom Meyer 09-11-2010 05:03 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Randy is tearing down for the record at earlville right now and not running first round. Tom

SPS 09-11-2010 05:27 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
So is this car a SFI 25-5 car or not? (would be an awful lot of work since Indy)

Don't know how the record could stand if it isn't.

Seems as though somebody really dropped the ball with these cars from the start....

Ford for knowingly sending them out with 1000+ HP and not sufficient chassis and NHRA for grossly underestimating the HP and thus their capabilities.

And all this in conditions that appear not much different than Indy.......wait 'till they get to good air.

FJ

Tom Moock 09-11-2010 09:38 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
I think they threw out the run of 8.47, he ran 8.50`s two times for the record, this is what i heard? if he gets to keep the record i`m not sure. Tom

Jason Fuller 09-12-2010 01:20 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
I just noticed the pics of his car...are those nine or ten in tires on the back?

This is obscene! Going faster than a SS/AH CAR? ON A LIGHT LAUNCH? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

SSDiv6 09-12-2010 01:40 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPS (Post 209750)

Ford for knowingly sending them out with 1000+ HP and not sufficient chassis and NHRA for grossly underestimating the HP and thus their capabilities.

FJ

Respecting the fact that you are chassis builder, I can see the SFI cage issue, but not having sufficient chassis, I have to disagree. There are lots of Mustangs running in the NMRA and NMCA classes in the 7's with small tires and the same type of suspension.

BlueOval Ralph 09-12-2010 09:42 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
Respecting the fact that you are chassis builder, I can see the SFI cage issue, but not having sufficient chassis, I have to disagree. There are lots of Mustangs running in the NMRA and NMCA classes in the 7's with small tires and the same type of suspension.

Now this is a strech NHRA doe's not make chassis rules, they pass all the blame to SFI and when you read the rule book it say's must meet SFI Spec so & so (wheels. chassis, belts' firesuits' helments and on and on). What NMRA & NMCA doe's doesn't have any impact on what NHRA doe's or has to meet. Yuall complained when IMPACT and SFI had their Tuff several months ago? but in the end SFI won. This will be what happens with NHRA, SFI will have finally say so!!! Don't forget that NHRA CANNOT afford to get on bad side of SFI as they also set the standards for Funny Car, Top Fuel, Pro Stock and all classes. Just what would happen if SFI pulls all NHRA cert's no body could race as NHRA could get Insurance to put on the meets.

SPS 09-12-2010 10:00 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
First, SSDIV6, the specs called for are called SFI 25-5 chassis specs. Look it up.

Secondly, the pics and a record statement are on Drag Race Central at 8.47 and definately no Funny Car cage so DEFINATELY no 25-5 spec chassis tag.

Don't know why we have rules if NHRA doesn't take action on this.

FJ

Chad Rhodes 09-12-2010 10:18 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueOval Ralph (Post 209869)
Respecting the fact that you are chassis builder, I can see the SFI cage issue, but not having sufficient chassis, I have to disagree. There are lots of Mustangs running in the NMRA and NMCA classes in the 7's with small tires and the same type of suspension.

Now this is a strech NHRA doe's not make chassis rules, they pass all the blame to SFI and when you read the rule book it say's must meet SFI Spec so & so (wheels. chassis, belts' firesuits' helments and on and on). What NMRA & NMCA doe's doesn't have any impact on what NHRA doe's or has to meet. Yuall complained when IMPACT and SFI had their Tuff several months ago? but in the end SFI won. This will be what happens with NHRA, SFI will have finally say so!!! Don't forget that NHRA CANNOT afford to get on bad side of SFI as they also set the standards for Funny Car, Top Fuel, Pro Stock and all classes. Just what would happen if SFI pulls all NHRA cert's no body could race as NHRA could get Insurance to put on the meets.

dear lord that was hard to read

lstanford 09-12-2010 10:34 AM

Re: Super CJ
 
I think Hopkins has it "in" for the Hemi boys. Only 331 cubic inches.

larrylomascolo 09-12-2010 01:13 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
im curious what 60 ft times this car runs ,this is unreal ,and there is more tweaking to get more i would imagine

Damn Yankee 09-12-2010 02:09 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPS (Post 209750)
So is this car a SFI 25-5 car or not? (would be an awful lot of work since Indy)

Don't know how the record could stand if it isn't.

Seems as though somebody really dropped the ball with these cars from the start....

Ford for knowingly sending them out with 1000+ HP and not sufficient chassis and NHRA for grossly underestimating the HP and thus their capabilities.

And all this in conditions that appear not much different than Indy.......wait 'till they get to good air.

FJ

Would you feel the same if the badging on the grill or fenderwell was GM, or Chevrolet :rolleyes:

Damn Yankee 09-12-2010 02:19 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SSDiv6 (Post 209835)
Respecting the fact that you are chassis builder, I can see the SFI cage issue, but not having sufficient chassis, I have to disagree. There are lots of Mustangs running in the NMRA and NMCA classes in the 7's with small tires and the same type of suspension.

What several racers seem to forget is it was the racing series like the NMRA, NMCA, and World Ford Events held in St Louis that brought about the need for new chassis certs. I dont quite understand a 280-290" Comp Eliminator car or SS/GT car at 2900-3100lbs needing 33x16" slicks, when a SBF with a Turbo and 2000HP can do it on true 10.5's :D

Mark Yacavone 09-12-2010 03:33 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damn Yankee (Post 209967)
What several racers seem to forget is it was the racing series like the NMRA, NMCA, and World Ford Events held in St Louis that brought about the need for new chassis certs. I dont quite understand a 280-290" Comp Eliminator car or SS/GT car at 2900-3100lbs needing 33x16" slicks, when a SBF with a Turbo and 2000HP can do it on true 10.5's :D

Consistency, for breakout racing.

SPS 09-12-2010 05:25 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Hey, Yankee, doesn't matter what kind of car it is.

For your information, I sat on the SFI committee that made these specs. Had nothing to do with NMCA etc.
At the time it had more to do with fast NHRA and IHRA modified cars and a need for a spec. In fact my personal Grand Am was used for ideas to write the 25-5 spec.

The point is, these cars are way too fast for a regular cage and should not be running this fast without the correct spec chassis.

The rules are specific and this shouldn't have happened.

FJ

Ed Wright 09-12-2010 06:37 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damn Yankee (Post 209967)
What several racers seem to forget is it was the racing series like the NMRA, NMCA, and World Ford Events held in St Louis that brought about the need for new chassis certs. I dont quite understand a 280-290" Comp Eliminator car or SS/GT car at 2900-3100lbs needing 33x16" slicks, when a SBF with a Turbo and 2000HP can do it on true 10.5's :D

I watch those some. A lot of them can't make to to the finish line 3 out of 5 passes.

Jeff Lee 09-12-2010 06:58 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright (Post 210049)
I watch those some. A lot of them can't make to to the finish line 3 out of 5 passes.

And a lot of them are either slammed into the guard rail or on the roof. Sometimes both.

Jason Fuller 09-12-2010 07:01 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPS (Post 210024)
Hey, Yankee, doesn't matter what kind of car it is.

For your information, I sat on the SFI committee that made these specs. Had nothing to do with NMCA etc.
At the time it had more to do with fast NHRA and IHRA modified cars and a need for a spec. In fact my personal Grand Am was used for ideas to write the 25-5 spec.

The point is, these cars are way too fast for a regular cage and should not be running this fast without the correct spec chassis.

The rules are specific and this shouldn't have happened.

FJ

My point exactly....but that's just to obscene...what a joke!

Jason Fuller 09-12-2010 07:04 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Lee (Post 210055)
And a lot of them are either slammed into the guard rail or on the roof. Sometimes both.

Yet, another point I conveyed earlier......

Barnstorm 09-12-2010 10:31 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Amazing car. Alot of us saw the car in Brainerd and knew Randy was working on getting the car to 60ft with a "powerglide 1.80". Looked ar his timeslip and watched the run...1.22 60ft and out and back in the groove...159mph on the chip for awhile. Most figured 8.39 at 160 plus. Factory stuff.

RULER 09-12-2010 11:04 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
GEEE WIZZZ, now some of you super stock guys can start to feel the pain that the stocker guys have been feelin lately, and don't just think this is only going to affect SS/AA, there are some other combo's that can fit nicely in some of the slower classes too. When these new cars hit stock some were saying well it doesn't affect me it only affects AA and A, well guess again!!!!

RPM5595 09-12-2010 11:18 PM

Re: Super CJ
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Barnstorm (Post 210145)
Amazing car. Alot of us saw the car in Brainerd and knew Randy was working on getting the car to 60ft with a "powerglide 1.80". Looked ar his timeslip and watched the run...1.22 60ft and out and back in the groove...159mph on the chip for awhile. Most figured 8.39 at 160 plus. Factory stuff.

A 1.22 60 ft.? Holy crap! I might need to re-think going to a PG,err, C2, or was that a C3PO?

Jay


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.