questions concerning christmas tree
Why dont the blinders go down far enough to cover the green and red lights? If you are going to block the tree, block the entire thing. The other question is the back drop on the tree. Wouldn't be better to have it white so you can see the bulbs better at night or when the sun is in your eyes at 7:30 in the morning at national events. Any thoughts on how to get these things changed,or leave well enough alone?
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Let me clarify, I'm talking on the tree its self. If you are chasing, watching the last bulb on your side then the green bulb on the other side comes on inches away from the bulb you are watching, it can be distracting. Just extend the blinder down on the tree to cover the bottom two bulbs.
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
I just with I could get them to spread the amber lights further apart on the tree, so I don't accidently get a glimps of the second light if I don't get behind my blinder just right. Those .4something reds like I had at Memphis are embarassing. :D
Or, I could just learn to drive... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
The new sanctioning org. should be called the NWHRA,the W is for whiners or whingers. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Ed said, ".I don't want or see a reason to change what has worked since 1964."
Problem is, it HASN'T ever worked... It has ALWAYS favored the second car to leave, in this way: It the first car to leave red lights, the second car to leave never has HIS chance to red light. He may well have a worse red light than the first car to leave, but he's never in that jeopardy if the first car bulbs. That makes NO SENSE. Why should ANYBODY get a free ride like that? They shouldn't... and it's the same if a AA/S car is running against an A/S, or a V/S car is running a W/S. The odds favor the second car to leave, if both leave before the green. This isn't about slow cars vs. fast cars; it's about ANY two cars that have dialin's... be they fast, or slow. Using your "logic", Ed, we'd still be making a loser out of the first car to breakout. They had it that way, at first, but fixed it after everybody saw how stupid that was. The worse breakout loses; why shouldn't the worse redlight lose???? Just because they couldn't fix that, back in 1963, doesn't mean it has "worked" for 46 years, They can fix it, now.... Oh yes, they have gotten the races run off, but then, there's more to fairness than just finishing the race on the day it started. And, if you think that complaining about a system that screws the first car to leave is "whining," then I can't even talk to you... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
It hasn't worked? Well, I'll be damned. We haven't been racing for decades, because of the red light rule? Boy, I sure am glad all you guys came along to tell us all drag racing hasn't worked for 40 years, the rest of us would never have figured that one out.:rolleyes:
I raced a slower car last year, a G/S Camaro and at least two rounds I lost to a faster car because I redlighted. I didn't feel the slightest bit cheated by the system or the rule. I felt like I screwed up. Because I screwed up, no one screwed me. If you built a slower car after the christmas tree and the first to go red rule came along, you made a conscious decision to do so knowing the rules. No one forced you to do it, and no one came along and changed the rules on you. How about we change the rules so that if the fast car spins, you have to rerun the race? Or, if the track is marginal, the slower car has to put WD-40 all over his slicks? If I get lucky and get another ride next year, you can bet I won't whine if it isn't a fast car, and I'll do the same thing if I go red as I did last year. Ask Fred Suiter, I pulled up and told him he ran a great race and he kicked my red lighting ***. I took my loss like a man, and like a racer, and tried to do better the next time. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Alan; I thought you were smarter than that... I have read your many posts, and you always, before, seemed to make a lot of sense... but I am thinking now, that your logic has been short-circuited by the possibility that you run a higher-classed car that would never benefit from the level playing field that a worse red light rule will provide.
You said, "It hasn't worked? Well, I'll be damned. We haven't been racing for decades, because of the red light rule? Boy, I sure am glad all you guys came along to tell us all drag racing hasn't worked for 40 years, the rest of us would never have figured that one out." Did I say it prevented us from racing at all??? No. I said it didn't "work," and, it didn't... and it doesn't. Would you like to return to "The first car to break out loses"??? That makes just as much sense... Think about it. What doesn't "work" about the current system is that it prevents equal red light jeopardy. The second car to leave is no longer in jeopardy of a red light, if the first car bulbs. Where is the other side of that coin??? There is none with the present system. But, this lopsided situation doesn't have to continue. What we now have, is a system, born of necessity (in 1963) when there was no electronic capability to provide a dual reaction-timing system. That time has come and gone, and now it can be fixed by utilizing software that compares the lights (reaction times) of BOTH cars, before a red light is displayed. People complain that it's "Just another change, and we've already had ENOUGH changes," but it's not a change that will affect anyone's driving program; nobody will be aware that it's even in place, until after both cars have left the line. There's simply no legitimate reason NOT to change this. But, since NHRA is what it is, and it won't make them one red cent, it will likely never happen there. I'd expect to see it in IHRA protocol before NHRA ever gets around to fixing it, so relax; your advantage is secure, for the moment. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
1 Attachment(s)
1963 1st year of the christmas tree..we were there just to watch.
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
Bill, do you own a car? Do you drive one? Do you even work on one? Hell, there's a possibility that I might drive a Top Fuel car. That doesn't change the way I think, either. I don't HAVE an advantage. I raced a SLOW G/S car last year. If I drive next year, I might race something else slow. EVERYTHING is a trade off. The faster cars have traction problems that slow cars don't have, they sit on the line a long time when racing slow cars, they don't get a clean tree when racing slower cars. They get two advantages for those three disadvantages, they chase slow cars, and they don't get the first chance to go red. Of all the things that can be done to improve the condition of sportsman racing, if that improves it at all, that would have to be all the way at the bottom of the list. Of all the things that are wrong, the same people keep bringing up the red light thing. That's like treating a hang nail on a guy with a sucking chest wound. People need to stop growing pearls. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
1. It's been going on for 36 years... THIRTY-SIX YEARS!!!! And, seemingly, nothing is being done about it. 2. It's an easy "fix" that requires nothing in the way of driving adjustment or changes, and no new hardware ($$$) is required by the associations or strips; it's just a software re-hash. 3. Some people still don't understand how it works (took me a LONG time to "get it") and the more they read about it, the closer they come to understanding why it's a good thing... 4. The other things that need fixing (schedules, P.A's for the pits, the AHFS-system, re-structuring the classes to de-fuse the Mustang/Drag-Pack Dodge situation, and about two dozen more,) are generally so complicated that they will take a long time to correct. This read light deal is something that could be done tomorrow.... so-to-speak. 5. I just like to run my mouth.... Hope you'll think about this, and if you can think of any rational, lgical, legitimate, reason that it wouldn't be an improvement in the "level playing field" aspect of handicapped drag racing. please tell me; I'm all ears!!! Thanks for listening. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Bill,buy a car,race it and then I'll take your wazooie ideas into consideration.Until then you're a keyboard racer who's constant meddling can cause grief to those who still chose to spend our hard earned money racing S/SS.Thanks for reading.
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Ed, I have a race car. I told you all about it in a post about a month ago.
Do you remember? I do... I know you're not as old as I am; you should remember... But, this issue doesn't require the owning of a car to understand it. What aspects of this worse red light question do you think requires the ownership of a car to understand? Enlighten me... please. P. S. What kind of grief would it cause you to finally get a fair shake when racing a quicker car? You never have, you know... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
1 Attachment(s)
Ed, This is the race car I don't have... according to you. The brown one...
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
FIRST or WORSE Why is it that the starting line always FIRST and the finish line is always WORSE What the hell is this. If its first at the starting line it should be first at the finish line. double brakeout should be the one that took the strip.should be out.
Hammer |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
i figured this one out last year.....DONT REDLIGHT:)
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Yeah, John; it's that double standard that needs to be fixed....
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
We have a very good racer in our area and he is well known. "Big Bucks" Bob Mullaney. Bob is a pretty damn good racer and has won countless races over the years. He is best in a bottom bulb footbrake car and has driven all kinds of cars from fast to very slow. He once raced an old Nova in Pro bracket and the car was usually about the slowest car in the bracket. He won many many times with that car and did what anyone that races a car like that has to do...HIT THE TREE well first above all else.....Once people know a racers ability, the pressure shifts from the slow car driver to the faster cars driver. He knows he must also cut a good light and then try to judge a much slower car. This perceived disadvantage of racing a slower car is next to nothing. Very few races are double redlights where the faster car redlighted by more than the slower car, Just trying to block the slower car as it leaves the line is also a distraction for the faster car. A much slower car is not that bad...but a car that is about a bulb slower is tough to completely block from view and it attracts the faster driver to follow and leave early. To me the bigger disadvantage to racing a slower car is trying to look over your shoulder and also find the finishline. A slower car is on the track longer and usually has more ET variations than a faster car. You choose what you bring to the track to race. There are plenty of guys that win and have won with slower cars. I raced my street car 2 times in Street et and ran some mid 17 second times......I got to the semi's second time I raced it. I found a comfortable launch technique.....Lost by .001" at the stripe.....dragging the brakes....against a 13 or 14 second car......had the better RT.......That was way to friggen slow for me.......I'd sooner watch paint dry.....
I have to ad that Bob Mullaney drove an R/SA Chevy wagon (SLOW CAR) to the Division 1 Stock championship one year and came pretty close to winning the national event at Maple Grove as I recall. Billy Nees has won also with an even slower car......and Ed F. has won as well. Fast cars outnumber slow cars by a lot these days and that is probably because people like racing faster cars more than any other reason....I have had Stockers and would not race anything slower than a 10 second car, even in Stock.... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
So reminiscing about the old days is fine but you don't have a dog in the fight anymore. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
It's not a "software problem", it's a "problem" in YOUR perception.
At best, it is a very minor "problem", if it is a "problem" at all. Do you want to know why a lot of us don't give a damn about this mole hill you are desperately trying to make into Mount Everest? I'll tell you why. Because there are a lot of real problems, that are very serious problems for a lot of racers. THESE problems are REAL deal breakers: Increased purses and fees, with reduced payouts, which will most certainly be even further reduced next year. Nothing like spending more to get less. Sportsman racers being held outside the gate, while tech is going on, and while their first time trial is being run, so that the "professionals" can park their rigs early. Nothing like driving all night and parking in a field, then being left there while the "pros" get their perks and your time trials go on without you. Piss poor track preparation. Nothing like a wasted time shot because they are too cheap or too lazy to prep the track. Absurd scheduling that makes it hard to keep on top of your plan for a day of racing. Sportsman racing either canceled or rescheduled at ridiculous times due to weather. It's great to never get your shot at class because of a brief shower, when you had a great chance at the win. Never mind sitting around for 2-3 days missing work so the pros can finish first, when they have nothing to do but race. Five day national events that could be done in three with decent scheduling and common sense, so people with an actual job wouldn't have to take a week off to go to a race and sit three days and race two. It's always cool to leave your business closed and not making money an extra couple of days, so you can sit and watch a dog and pony show on the three days of a five day event that you don't run. I could probably list 20 more real serious problems that actually need attention, as opposed to the "perceived crisis" of "unfair " red light issues. As I said before, there are a lot of serious problems that Stock and Super Stock face, and yet here you are again, campaigning and complaining constantly about a hangnail, while we're all struggling to survive a sucking chest wound. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Alan,
All the complaining in the world about the problems you mentioned has nothing to do with this issue. If you think it's not important, then, ignore it. It's not worth your time. I think it's a mole hill, but one that people have been tripping over for 36 years, and it's time to level it out, and level the playing field, in the process. Doing so, won't affect any of the many other problems you mentioned in the slightest... one way, or another. In all your verbiage, you still have not come up with one single reason NOT to fix it... none. Even YOU can't logically defend keeping this lopsided rule in effect. That is very telling. Glendora couldn't care less, I am sure; if they cared, it would have been fixed long ago. I'm not holding my breath... Thanks for your comments. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Bill,
You have done an excellent job of expressing your viewpoint in this debate. I have given this issue a lot of thought,and I have come to the conclusion that unless the race is a double redlight situation,it really makes no difference. I also have come up with the conclusion that if two drivers redlight,they should BOTH be out. I don't care if it is a .001 red to a .500 red,you redlight....YOU LOSE...PERIOD. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Thanks for the comments. I'm going to have to think about that one for awhile...
What if it happens in the Final??? NO WINNER?????? NHRA would LOVE that (getting to keep the prize money for themselves!!!) LOL! Ah, the possibilities... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
It still comes down to the fact that you are BRACKET RACING not CLASS RACING.Go and tell it to the guys in the bracket racing section.
Oh,and you don't get or need grade points to bracket race. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
"Do you want to know why a lot of us don't give a damn about this mole hill you are desperately trying to make into Mount Everest? I'll tell you why. Because there are a lot of real problems, that are very serious problems for a lot of racers."
Yes, Alan ,I agree, but this thread is about Christmas tree issues. Ones that affect a lot more racers than those in S/SS. I suppose I could look at the first redlight thing from both sides. I haven't sold the Mustang yet, so if I race it next year, I'll be leaving first about 99.9% of the time. Therefore ,I should want the rule changed because it might benefit ME. But ,on the other hand I'm putting together a 62 Tempest A/FX tribute car to run in Sportsman (12.0 and slower) next year. I don't plan on ever leaving first with that one. So I could say "leave things alone...it's been working fine for 46 years, etc. Not changing the rule would benefit ME with my bracket car. Which way would benefit ME more? ... I really don't care about that at all . I would vote for what's best for the sport in the long run. I would say that would be to change the software to a WORSE , rather than a FIRST redlight rule. If someone could convince me otherwise...that this would not be a positive step for the sport as a whole, I'd like to hear it. I haven't heard anything so far. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Ed,
RE your comment: "It still comes down to the fact that you are BRACKET RACING not CLASS RACING.Go and tell it to the guys in the bracket racing section." Show me the difference in the outcome in a Bracket race and a handicapped Stock/Super Stock race if I am the first car to leave, and I red light. There IS NO DIFFERENCE! In BOTH CASES, the first car to leave has been ruled the LOSER, without the other car ever having a chance to face the same red light jeopardy as I faced. It's not an equitable situation in EITHER race; The first to leave is screwed, in both cases. There is another BB on this site for people who actually run a class car with a permanent number. You can't post there, unless you have one. I can't post there, because my racing is just Bracket variety.... This site is for people like me; it's available to anyone who has pictures, stories, and ideas that they feel might be of interest, or for discussion. That's why this site exists. I am certain that NHRA is oblivious to me, and has no interest at all in what I say here. My "blathering", as you call it, might be read by them at some point, but if it's really just "blathering," then they will have ZERO interest in it. My comments and ideas are directed at people who RACE (Bracket OR Class), who have the ability to think for themselves and who might be open to new ideas. As I said, it took me a long time (weeks, actually) to be able to grasp the way this works, simple though it may be, because I was so "set in my ways" and steeped in tradition. I'm sure the poor guy explaining it to me ran out of patience, long before I finally "got it".... because it had always been the "other" way. I would hope that if enough racers get wind of this method of running the red light program, which favors NOBODY, tthat THEY will pressure NHRA to change it, but that may take years, if EVER.... I'm not holding my breath... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Thanks, Mark, for a very well-put, and insightful post. I wish everybody could see it like you do; you truly grasp all the aspects of the situation.
Is your A/FX car a '63 421 clone? Is it a station wagon or a coupe??? Those cars were awesome. Too bad the transaxle wasn't up to the job.... I think it was made from 2 Corvair Powerglide cases, and had great ratios; and, if I remember correctly, was available with a clutch OR a converter!!! Ultimately, though, nearly all were replaced with a live rear axle and a B & M-type Hydro, I have read. Can't wait to see your car. Is it on a website, anywhere? Thanks for any information.... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Only in a perfect world............................................. .................................................. ..............
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Three examples from the Division Seven race at Vegas where the wrong car won...............
ROUND ONE VEGAS DIVISIONAL !! Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed 5370 Al Steinmetz 7897 Andy Kimball E1 -0.055 11.482 115.61 ****WINNER**** -0.108 11.068 119.50 F/S Dial: 11.50 (+/-): -0.018 E/S Dial: 11.05 (+/-): 0.018 Qualified: #75 11.540 -0.860 #14 11.023 -1.227 Andy Kimball wins on a double red light. Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed 779 Chuck Echmalian 6111 Mary Ann Method E1 -0.025 11.627 111.49 ****WINNER**** -0.068 10.865 120.52 G/SA Dial: 11.80 (+/-): -0.173 C/SA Dial: 10.85 (+/-): 0.015 Qualified: #84 11.840 -0.770 #23 10.848 -1.142 Mary Ann Method wins on a double red light. ROUND FOUR Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed 7402 Tibor Kadar 4402 Jerry Emmons E4 -0.007 12.343 94.26 ****WINNER**** -0.341 15.708 59.69 L/SA Dial: 12.22 (+/-): 0.123 B/SA Dial: 10.79 (+/-): 4.918 Prior rounds: E3 (J Irving ) 0.037 12.244 -0.026 (M Ann Method) 0.029 10.794 0.004 E2 (R Irving ) 0.055 12.196 0.006 (J Foshee ) 0.054 10.744 0.024 E1 (S Hook ) 0.006 12.413 0.163 (R Johnson ) 0.042 10.804 0.034 Qualified: #31 12.217 -1.103 #39 10.759 -1.081 Jerry Emmons wins on a -0.007 red light by Kadar. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quack,quack,quack,quack,quack,etc. etc. etc.
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
You assume that the change you desire will level the playing field. But you don't know that to be true. You only know that it would appear to have the same effect on everyone. That may not be true. Rules are not necessarily about making everything the same for everyone. They are often about achieving or trying to achieve balance. In handicap drag racing you can NEVER make everything the same for every racer. It is impossible. You cannot give both racers in a handicap race a clean tree. Nor can you give both racers the same waiting time for the last yellow to come on. You see what you assume is a glaring inequity that you feel you have the solution for. Others see that what you think is simple and obvious is actually neither simple nor obvious. You assume that a balance does not exist, but you do not really know that for sure, and yet you still seek to change something, without having the knowledge to be certain you will not actually upset an existing balance. Beware the law of unintended consequences. You THINK you will level the playing field, but do you have statistical data to prove it? Do you have definitive proof that an actual imbalance exists? Or do you simply see what you think is an inexcusable inequity? |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Alan,
This situation cannot be saddled with a thousand and one OTHER inequities that exist in handicap racing, in an effort to "level the playing" field, because there is no way to quantify the effects of "leaving on a clean tree", or "driving the stripe from behind." You know there are many, many ways in which a faster car has an advantage over a slow car, and vice-versa. You cannot justify legislating advantages for either group, in an effort to "level the playing field." This worse red light situation cannot be viewed as an effort to do that, because of the crazy-quilt that is Eliminator racing. By that I mean, it changes, every time you're up to bat, depending on what class of car you're racing. You run an F car with your G car (your dial-in will almost always be slower) you are the victim; if you red light... he never is under "red light jeopardy." You run an H car with your G car (your dial-in will almost always be faster) HE is the victim if HE red lights, never putting YOU in the jeopardy of a red light. Giving the quicker car (second to leave) a free ride, if the first car red lights, is a benefit to anyone, ONLY when they are the second to leave, and the other car red lights. The only place this becomes a significant inequity, it could be argued, is when a car is classed either very high, or very low in the hierarchy of the classes. For example, you don't need a statistical analysis to conclude that Ellis Buth's W/SA wagon is on the wrong end of this system (virtually, always leaving first), or that the new, 9-second Mustangs are on the "right" end of it. The Mustangs enjoy an immunity from red lights IF their opponent bulbs. Ellis's Pinto NEVER enjoys such an advantage. I asked, "Where is the other side of that coin" relative to the fact that the quicker car sometimes enjoys this advantage, but there is none. THAT is an "inexcusable inequity," in my book, because it is unnecessary, now, and accomplishes nothing. Can you show me the other side of that coin? Thanks for your input; I enjoy discussing things with you. |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
When you are racing are you watching if the other guy turns on the red light, or you watching the tree?
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
John,
NOBODY's red light comes on until BOTH cars have left the line. Once they've both launched, the computer decides who had the worst red light and turns it on. It can't do that before both cars have left, so nobody will see any red lights until after they've launched. Hope this helps... |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
That you choose to believe that a balance does not exist does not make it so.
Citing extremes in order to make rules or to justify them is never a good idea. Again, you ignore the law of unintended consequences simply because it is easy, convenient, and suits your agenda. Just because something can be done does not make it the right thing to do, nor does it mean that it should be done. I know plenty of guys with slower cars, the red light rule doesn't seem to matter to most of them, in fact, I'd say more than 1/2 of them would rather the rule not be changed, and most of the rest just don't care. Ever thought that maybe, just maybe, they don't want your help? This whole thing reminds me a lot of "we're from the government, and we're here to help". |
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
Quote:
|
Re: questions concerning christmas tree
>>>"Again, you ignore the law of unintended consequences simply because it is easy, convenient, and suits your agenda."
Okay; Alan, please give me an example of ANY "unintended consequence" that might come from this rule change I'm advocating. I can't think of one; can you??? Please tell me of an "unintended consequence" that could come from this rule change that could have a negative impact on racing. Just one... please. RE: "And then neither will see the red light, because the tree is behind them, because both cars have launched and then the computer makes up its mind after the fact. MAYBE one or both drivers will see a win light come on, or maybe they won't." And, this will affect the race how??? I don't know anybody who is oblivious to a win light... but then, I don't know everybody. Maybe they could install a red light beside the win lights that would appear as the win light in the other lane comes on... a minor issue, at worst. And, it will take the computer a millisecond to turn on the red light, once the second car has driven out of the beam; think he might see it as he passes the tree??? Finally, I don't have an agenda; I'll be racing no matter if they never change this, and they probably won't. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.