Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
D. Johns,
The guy I sold it to, pulled the G-Force out and sold it, also sold the good 9 inch 3rd member and strange brakes off the car. He put an auto in it and tried to drive on the street. He sold to a guy that ran it in the NHRA Unleashed series a couple races. Then he sold it to guy that called me a couple months ago, and supposedly going to make it a legal stocker again. Bret Velde |
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Quote:
I have said it before on here, but the current Stock Eliminator rules have gone in a direction that is totally opposite from what the factories are producing for the street. That is why the current factory race cars came into being. Like them or not, they are built according to the current rules. For the CTS-V to be a good combination it would need a weight break that reflects the items that can legally be removed (maybe 3500 lbs). It would also need a realistic HP number (maybe 425-450). GM could submit this, but as your e-mails point out, they won't. To suggest that it is a good idea to build a 4250 lb CTS-V for CC/SA is crazy. Just a little research would tell you how badly it would be out gunned (as others have pointed out). Keep in mind that the LS3 based cylinder heads are pretty good, but not anything like the LS7 heads used on the blown COPO's. Add the small blower and you have a hard uphill road to climb. Sorry for the late reply, but I was in El Salvador working when I posted my last comment and haven't had much in the way of internet time until now. |
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Well said GUMP! And with that being said, IMO this is one of the biggest reasons Stock and Super Stock is a dying breed. Along with Super Street, Super Gas and Super Comp, all of these classes are bracket racing and not drag racing. Boring to drive and boring for fans. Whatever happened to drag racing where you try to go faster than the last pass? It's in Comp and all the Pro Categories and they seem to do well. That's real drag racing!!! If we want to save the sport IMO we need to go back to the old days allowing aftermarket parts for blocks and heads. Quit this index stuff do away with all the timers and get back to driving the cars.:rolleyes:
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Whoa!
"......it's in Comp and the Pros and they seem to be doing well..." I don't think so, short fields, a handful of owners.....anyone proposing heads up racing is not thinking this through One example...the 30 car fields for Hemi shoot outs are over.....take 2 to 3 "all-in-players" and the pretenders stay home when they realize they ain't got no shot |
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Quote:
|
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Maybe CC/AT should be considered??
Then no need for NHRA classification guide acceptance. GM is coming out with the 3.6L turbo engine for Caddy in '14. Thanks RonP |
Re: 2012 Camaro in the NHRA Classguide
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.