Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
|
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
|
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
In head's up, first is worst. Won't make any bit of difference for the pro's. |
Re: The rumor of the day
I too have always wondered why the red light was left off the first or worse list.
Think about it! There's a first or worse rule. Except when you red light??? Makes no sense. Could you guys imagine the breakout rule being the same? You breakout by .01 and your opponent breaks out by .05. The .01 breakout loses because he got there first? It wouldn't even make sense right??? As it stands either does the red light rule. |
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I used to be adamantly against the Worst Redlight rule, primarily due simply to resistance to change, and in deference to history. These days, I wouldn't really care which way they did it. My attitude is, "Tell me what the rules of the playground are, and I'll go play on it." |
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
You kinda missed the point. Heads-up as in eliminations. |
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
|
Re: The rumor of the day
Bruce,
I have read your posts on this board for a long time; I know you to be a really intelligent guy in a lot of respects, with loads of experience and savvy as regards drag racing. You have been a participant in this discussion about worse red lights on many occasions. Given all that, your current posts make me wonder if you understand how this system would work (if implimented, which probably wll never happen, anyway), because of some comments you've made. To wit: Phillip marvetz (sic) posted his opinion: " If NHRA makes this change it won't be for us, It will be for the PRO'S" (which made no sense to me, because the double red light rule only comes into play on handicapped races, and NONE of the Pro races have handicaps.) "Bobby" then said, "In head's up, first is worst. Won't make any bit of difference for the pro's." That was just an attempt to correct Phillip's assessment of the situation. Then, you posted, " Bobby, You kinda missed the point. Heads-up as in eliminations." I don't understand what you meant by that. Phillip posted something that had no validity within the confines of this discussion (nobody is talking about "Pros" OR heads-up runs, at all) and when he (Bobby) points that out, you're saying he "missed the point?" Exactly what was the point that Bobby missed?? Fill us in; I'm obviously not the only one who was puzzled by your contention that Bobby "missed the point." |
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
I noticed nobody trying to argue with what Randall Klein or Bob Unkefer said. Definitely two of the best posts so far. Doing this just flat out makes sense. At least, if it's something that isn't terribly hard to do. Which it has been indicated (I believe even by compulink) that it is not a difficult change to make in the system. Phil, What the heck does this have to do with the pros? This only matters to handicapped races. The last time I checked all pro classes run heads up. How does this matter to them? I hear you guys saying how this is gonna change everything. How? Give an example? If you can that is, something tells me a lot of you don't understand how this would effect things. Or you don't want to be honest about it because you have a car on the faster end of the spectrum. A lot of changes in stock have been bad. But you somehow take that to mean any change is bad. This one is in the name of logic and fairness. |
Re: The rumor of the day
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.